United States v. Marcus Allen
| United States of America |
| Marcus Allen, Marcus Laverne Allen, originally named, also known as House |
| 26-1454 |
| March 13, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Tendered: Petition for Rehearing received from Appellant Marcus Allen. [5636244] [26-1454] (HAG) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:14 PM] |
| PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Marcus Allen, w/service by USCA8 05/06/2026. [5637297] [26-1454] (HAG) [Entered: 05/06/2026 04:15 PM] |
| Tendered: "Motion for jurisdictional clarification and, in the alternative, certificate of appealability" received from Appellant Marcus Allen [5630492] [26-1454] (HAG) [Entered: 04/20/2026 10:06 AM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Marcus Allenn w/service by USCA8 04/28/2026, [5633495] [26-1454] (HAG) [Entered: 04/28/2026 12:18 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, DUANE BENTON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Apr 2026 [5626444] [26-1454] (HAG) [Entered: 04/07/2026 02:56 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Lavenski R. Smith, Duane Benton, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5626441] [26-1454] (HAG) [Entered: 04/07/2026 02:51 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed PSI Report, Source Location: USDC / EA [5620228] [26-1454] (STL) [Entered: 03/19/2026 01:46 PM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5618472] [26-1454] (CMH) [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:26 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Judgment 06/22/2015, and Order 03/03/2026. [5618477] [26-1454] (CMH) [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:30 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5618485] [26-1454] (CMH) [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Marcus Allen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Julie E. Peters |
| Represented By: | Cameron C. McCree |
| Represented By: | Chris Givens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Marcus Allen, Marcus Laverne Allen, originally named, also known as House | |
| Represented By: | Marcus Allen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
