Kenneth Pitts v. Dexter Payne, et al
| Kenneth Ray Pitts |
| Dexter Payne and State of Arkansas |
| 26-1469 |
| March 17, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court order of 05/06/2026 denying motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. [5637755] [26-1469] (CMH) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:03 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/04/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5637757] [26-1469] (CMH) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:04 PM] |
| SECOND MEMORANDUM of Appellant Kenneth Ray Pitts in support of notice of appeal, w/service 05/05/2026. [5636557] [26-1469] (CMH) [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:42 PM] |
| MEMORANDUM of Appellant Kenneth Ray Pitts in support of notice of appeal, Doc No. [ # 5619375-2 ]. w/service 05/04/2026. [5636256] [26-1469] (EDG) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:23 PM] |
| Supporting Document filed by Appellant Kenneth Ray Pitts, in support of originating court document notice of appeal [ # 5619375-2 ], w/service 04/29/2026. [5634209] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 04/29/2026 12:52 PM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to clerk order regarding paying the docketing fee [ # 5619377-2 ], filed by Party Kenneth Ray Pitts, w/service 04/29/2026. [5634215] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 04/29/2026 12:56 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Kenneth Ray Pitts, w/service 04/29/2026. [5634219] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 04/29/2026 12:59 PM] |
| Tendered Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, received from Appellant Kenneth Ray Pitts, to the District Court Clerk's Office. [5634301] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:20 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent to the Eastern District of Arkansas, District Court, forwarding Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. [5634303] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:23 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Certificate of Service filed by Kenneth Ray Pitts, w/service 04/29/2026. [5634319] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 04/29/2026 02:31 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Kenneth Ray Pitts due 04/22/2026. [5626959] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 04/08/2026 02:31 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5619365] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 03/17/2026 02:37 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Recommended Disposition 02/13/2025, Order 03/03/2025, and Judgment 03/03/2025. [5619375] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 03/17/2026 02:48 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/07/2026, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5619377] [26-1469] (CJO) [Entered: 03/17/2026 02:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
