Kaiven Wesley v. Tiffany Kinley, et al
| Kaiven Lemar Wesley |
| Tiffany Kinley, Jail Supervisor, Ouachita County Detention Center (OCDC), Stephanie Holmes, Jail Nurse OCDC, Keane Lipps, also known as K. Lipps, Dr. Joseph Deluca, Jail Doctor, OCDC and Jail Administrator Cameron Owens |
| 26-1486 |
| March 19, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGE ORDER:Granting [ # 5639556-2 ] motion for extension of time to file rehearing and denying the request to appoint counsel filed by Appellant Kaiven Lemar Wesley. Petition for rehearing due on 06/11/2026. Special Apr 2026 [5640408] [26-1486] (GP) [Entered: 05/14/2026 04:30 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing and for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Kaiven Lemar Wesley w/service 05/13/2026 by USCA8. [5639556] [26-1486] (GP) [Entered: 05/13/2026 09:10 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - motion for ifp filed by Kaiven Lemar Wesley. w/service 05/04/2026 by USCA8 [5636279] [26-1486] (CRJ) [Entered: 05/04/2026 04:54 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-1486: due] [5633944] [26-1486] (CRJ) [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:57 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Denying [ # 5631085-2 ] motion for stay filed by Appellant Kaiven Lemar Wesley. Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as premature. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Apr 2026 [5633923] [26-1486] (CRJ) [Entered: 04/29/2026 09:38 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court order of 04/01/2026 striking pro se notice of appeal and motion for new trial.[5631716] [26-1486] (CMH) [Entered: 04/22/2026 02:27 PM] |
| MOTION for stay, filed by Appellant Kaiven Lemar Wesley w/service 04/21/2026. [5631085] [26-1486] (CMH) [Entered: 04/21/2026 11:37 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED RECORDS, Comments: 1 envelope containing District Court documents #222, #223, #224, #225, #226, and #233 [Copy do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / WAED [5620637] [26-1486] (STL) [Entered: 03/20/2026 01:32 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5620117] [26-1486] (CMH) [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:04 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Judgment 03/05/2026. [5620125] [26-1486] (CMH) [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:16 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: for limited remand. Upon review of the district court's record, the appellant was previously allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. This case is remanded to district court for calculation and collection of appellate filing fees pursuant to Henderson v. Norris, 129F.3d 481 (8th Cir. 1997). [5620138] [26-1486] (CMH) [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:21 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5620143] [26-1486] (CMH) [Entered: 03/19/2026 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
