Peter Grigg v. Judge Matthew Cuffe
| Peter Grigg |
| Judge Matthew Cuffe |
| 26-1510 |
| March 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [ # 5631914-2 ] is granted. This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, DUANE BENTON and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD Adp May 2026 [5640895] [26-1510] (NDG) [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:33 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Lavenski R. Smith, Duane Benton, Bobby E. Shepherd in St. Louis [5640892] [26-1510] (NDG) [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:28 PM] |
| 2d MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Peter Grigg. [5631914] [26-1510] (MMH) [Entered: 04/23/2026 09:53 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of second notice of appeal (w/cover letter forwarding same from USCA to district court) and docket entries [5625853] [26-1510] (MMH) [Entered: 04/06/2026 12:31 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Peter Grigg. [5625861] [26-1510] (MMH) [Entered: 04/06/2026 12:50 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5620957] [26-1510] (MMH) [Entered: 03/23/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Report and Recommendation 2/23/26, Order Adopting R&R 3/9/26, Judgment 3/9/26, notice of appeal, and docket entries [5620964] [26-1510] (MMH) [Entered: 03/23/2026 11:35 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5620965] [26-1510] (MMH) [Entered: 03/23/2026 11:35 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/20/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5620966] [26-1510] (MMH) [Entered: 03/23/2026 11:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Peter Grigg v. Judge Matthew Cuffe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter Grigg | |
| Represented By: | Peter Grigg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Judge Matthew Cuffe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
