In re: Aaron Broussard
| In re: Aaron Rhy Broussard |
| 26-1533 |
| March 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - The petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard is denied [ # 5621771-2 ]. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DENIED. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD Adp Mar 2026 [5623544] [26-1533] (DAK) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:22 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5623557] [26-1533] (DAK) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:31 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Lavenski R. Smith, Raymond W. Gruender, Bobby E. Shepherd in St. Louis [5623536] [26-1533] (DAK) [Entered: 03/30/2026 03:16 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5621769] [26-1533] (ASL) [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:10 AM] |
| PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Aaron Rhy Broussard w/service 03/25/2026 [5621771] [26-1533] (ASL) [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Aaron Broussard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Aaron Rhy Broussard | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Rhy Broussard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
