Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. v. Vincent Cannady
| Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. |
| Vincent Cannady and Manpower |
| Experis, Gary Langham and Markus Engle |
| 26-1535 |
| March 25, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Vincent Cannady due 09/25/2026 [5682518] [26-1535, 26-1975] (RDB) [Entered: 09/11/2026 11:08 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The appellants motion [ # 5671684-3 ] is granted in part and denied in part as follows. The appellants motion is denied in part as moot because the appellants document was timely mailed and is accepted for filing. The appellants motion for an extension of time to complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which is attached to this order, is granted until September 8, 2026. If the appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by September 8, 2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. No further extensions of the deadline to move for IFP status will be granted. Upon receipt of a timely filed motion to proceed IFP, any remaining motions will be referred to the court. [5672703] [26-1535, 26-1975] (RDB) [Entered: 08/17/2026 10:57 AM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION to accept late filing, renewed motion for order directing MDC Brooklyn to provide inmate trust account statement, and authorization for payment of appellate filing fee from inmate trust account filed by Appellant Vincent Cannady in 26-1535 w/service 08/12/2026. [5671684] [26-1535, 26-1975] (RDB) [Entered: 08/13/2026 08:56 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The appellant has filed a motion for extension of time to file the application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the show cause order of June 17, 2026, is hereby dissolved. The motion for extension of time is granted. The appellant has until August 7, 2026, to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. The appellants motion for an order directing the Metropolitan Detention Center to provide a certified inmate trust account statement is denied without prejudice subject to resubmission if the appellant does not have the account statement to file with the otherwise completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by August 7, 2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5658157] [26-1535, 26-1975] (RDB) [Entered: 07/07/2026 10:17 AM] |
| MOTION for order directing MDC Brooklyn to provide certified inmate trust account statement filed by Appellant Vincent Cannady in 26-1535 w/service 07/06/2026. [5657821] [26-1535, 26-1975] (RDB) [Entered: 07/06/2026 01:31 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - notice regarding inmate trust account statement and request for appropriate relief filed by Vincent Cannady in 26-1535 w/service 07/06/2026 [5657820] [26-1535, 26-1975] (RDB) [Entered: 07/06/2026 01:28 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Vincent Cannady due 07/01/2026 [5652082] [26-1535] (RDB) [Entered: 06/17/2026 01:22 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 05/05/2026 denying leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5640424] [26-1535] (RDB) [Entered: 05/14/2026 04:46 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/11/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5640425] [26-1535] (RDB) [Entered: 05/14/2026 04:46 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/29/2026, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5626928] [26-1535] (RDB) [Entered: 04/08/2026 02:11 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5621796] [26-1535]--[Edited 03/25/2026 by RDB to correct case opening letter] (RDB) [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:37 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 3/16/2026 [5621800] [26-1535] (RDB) [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:39 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5621801] [26-1535] (RDB) [Entered: 03/25/2026 09:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
