Leonard Noble v. John Kemp, et al
| Leonard Noble |
| John Dan Kemp, Chief Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, Cody Hiland, Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, Rhonda K. Wood, Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, Shawn A. Womack, Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, Barbara Womack Webb, Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court, Stephen Tabor, Circuit Judge, Sebastian County, Karen R. Baker, Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court and Courtney Hudson, Associate Justice, Arkansas Supreme Court (originally named as Courtney Goodson) |
| 26-1551 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER: The second motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Leonard Noble, [ # 5641516-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5641526] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 05/19/2026 10:17 AM] |
| SECOND MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Leonard Noble w/service 05/18/2026. [5641516] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 05/19/2026 10:09 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court order of 05/12/2026 vacating portions of its 04/10/2026 regarding the calculation and collection of the appellate filing fees. [5639792] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 05/13/2026 02:28 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Leonard Noble w/service 05/12/2026. [5639000] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 05/12/2026 09:26 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - PRO SE APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Leonard Noble, w/service 05/12/2026. Length: 10 pages (Copies: 5). The court has received and filed appellant's brief. Because no briefing schedule has been established, the appellant's brief is premature. Until a briefing schedule is established, no appellee responsive brief is due at this time. [5639188] [26-1551] (HAG) [Entered: 05/12/2026 12:00 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER: The district court is directed to vacate the portion of its 04/10/2026, order regarding the calculation and collection of the appellate filing fee. Appellant Leonard Noble is required to pay the appellate filing fee in full to the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in this court on or before 06/01/2026. Adp Apr 2026 [5635814] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 05/04/2026 09:53 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court order of 04/10/2026 regarding calculation and collection of appellate filing fee. [5632717] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 04/24/2026 03:47 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-1551: plra] [5632718] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 04/24/2026 03:48 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5622499] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:28 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 06/12/2025, Judgment 06/12/2025, and Order 03/16/2026. [5622504] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:34 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: for limited remand. Upon review of the district court's record, the appellant was previously allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. This case is remanded to district court for calculation and collection of appellate filing fees pursuant to Henderson v. Norris, 129F.3d 481 (8th Cir. 1997). [5622523] [26-1551] (CMH) [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
