Kevin Smith v. Rick Eberhardt, et al
| Kevin G. Smith |
| Rick Eberhardt, Individual and Official capacity, Jason Dwinell, Individual and Official capacity, Jesse Frank, Individual and Official capacity, Clayton Bratcher, Individual and Official capacity, Wayne County Sheriff Office and Pierce County Sheriff Office/Jail |
| 26-1743 |
| April 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Prisoner case docketed. [5631315] [26-1743] (RDB) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:03 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 3/19/2026, Judgment dated 3/19/2026, Order dated 4/20/2026 [5631320] [26-1743] (RDB) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:16 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5631326] [26-1743] (RDB) [Entered: 04/21/2026 04:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
