Randy Gay v. Dexter Payne
| Randy William Gay |
| Dexter Payne, Arkansas Division of Correction |
| 26-1786 |
| April 27, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Death Penalty |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Randy William Gay in 26-1877 w/service 06/11/2026 [5649971] [26-1877, 26-1786] (MF) [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:49 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 5639154-2 ] unopposed motion for extension of time to file app for COA filed by Melissa Fenwick for Cross-Appellant Randy Gay in 26-1877 [5640904] [26-1877, 26-1786] (EDG) [Entered: 05/15/2026 04:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Walker K. Hawkins for Appellant Dexter Payne w/service 05/12/2026 [5639455] [26-1786] (WH) [Entered: 05/12/2026 05:29 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file COA until 06/11/2026, filed by Attorney Melissa Fenwick for Appellant Randy William Gay in 26-1877 w/service 05/12/2026. [5639154] [26-1877, 26-1786] (MF) [Entered: 05/12/2026 11:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by A. Evangeline Bacon for Appellant Dexter Payne w/service 05/12/2026 [5639457] [26-1786] (EB) [Entered: 05/12/2026 05:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Lucie T. Butner for Appellee Randy William Gay w/service 05/08/2026 [5638125] [26-1786] (MF) [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:38 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Melissa Fenwick for Appellee Randy William Gay w/service 05/08/2026 [5638118] [26-1786] (MF) [Entered: 05/08/2026 11:36 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The briefing schedule in this case has been vacated and the case has been held in abeyance pending a resolution of whether a certificate of appealability will be granted by this court in case 26-1877. [5637523] [26-1786] (CMH) [Entered: 05/07/2026 10:54 AM] |
| Death Penalty case docketed. [26-1786] (CMH) [Entered: 04/27/2026 01:52 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Opinion & Order 03/27/2026, and Judgment 03/31/2026. [5633073] [26-1786] (CMH) [Entered: 04/27/2026 02:05 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellee in this case. [5633099] [26-1786] (CMH) [Entered: 04/27/2026 02:40 PM] |
| VACATED -- BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 06/08/2026. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Dexter Payne due 06/08/2026. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5633118] [26-1786]--[Edited 05/07/2026 by CMH] (CMH) [Entered: 04/27/2026 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Randy Gay v. Dexter Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Randy William Gay | |
| Represented By: | Randy William Gay |
| Represented By: | Melissa Fenwick |
| Represented By: | Lucie T. Butner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Dexter Payne, Arkansas Division of Correction | |
| Represented By: | Walker Hawkins |
| Represented By: | Evangeline Bacon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.