George Chambers v. State of Iowa, et al
| George Thomas Chambers |
| State of Iowa, Anamosa State Penitentiary, Clarinda Correctional Facility, Fort Madison Penitentiary and Newton Correctional Facility |
| 26-1847 |
| May 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely. Appellant's [ # 5641246-2 ] motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied as moot. JANE KELLY, RALPH R. ERICKSON and DAVID R. STRAS Adp May 2026 [5646751] [26-1847] (HAG) [Entered: 06/02/2026 12:32 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Party George Thomas Chambers w/service 05/18/2026. [5641246] [26-1847] (ASL) [Entered: 05/18/2026 02:52 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5635839] [26-1847] (ASL) [Entered: 05/04/2026 10:24 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 4/24/2026, Order filed 1/6/2026, Judgment filed 1/6/2026, and docket entries, [5635852] [26-1847] (ASL) [Entered: 05/04/2026 10:31 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER :The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/01/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5635857] [26-1847] (ASL) [Entered: 05/04/2026 10:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.