Arthur Senty-Haugen v. Minnesota DHS, et al
Plaintiff: Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services and Minnesota Sex Offender Program
Case Number: 26-1893
Filed: May 8, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2026 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 05/06/2026 denying Senty-Haugen's applications for both COA and IFP, [5641981] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/20/2026 09:07 AM]
May 18, 2026 Tendered application for certificate of appealability with exhibits and certificate of service received from Appellant Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen. [5641433] [26-1893] (CMH) [Entered: 05/19/2026 08:48 AM]
May 18, 2026 Tendered duplicate copy of notice of appeal received from Appellant Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen. [5641427] [26-1893] (CMH) [Entered: 05/19/2026 08:37 AM]
May 18, 2026 Tendered motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis received from Appellant Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen. [5641434] [26-1893] (CMH) [Entered: 05/19/2026 08:51 AM]
May 18, 2026 DOCUMENT FILED - Duplicate notice of appeal with Certificate of Service - showing notice of appeal was timely mailed - filed by Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen. [5641939] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:28 AM]
May 18, 2026 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen w/service 05/20/2026 [5641955] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:48 AM]
May 18, 2026 DOCUMENT FILED - Duplicate motion for IFP (this motion was filed in the district court and subsequently denied) filed by Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen. w/service 05/20/2026 [5641965] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/20/2026 08:55 AM]
May 18, 2026 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Party Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen w/service 05/26/2026. [5643576] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/26/2026 08:14 AM]
May 8, 2026 Prisoner case docketed. [5638024] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:48 AM]
May 8, 2026 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 4/29/2026, R & R filed 2/12/2026, Order filed 3/24/2026, Judgment filed 3/25/2026, Order on IFP filed 5/6/2026, and docket entries, [5638045] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/08/2026 10:06 AM]
May 8, 2026 CLERK ORDER: Appellant is directed to provide the court with a declaration under penalties of perjury or a notarized statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c)(1)(A) stating the date in which the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions internal mail system. Response of Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen due 05/22/2026 [5638047] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/08/2026 10:07 AM]
May 8, 2026 CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/05/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5638050] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/08/2026 10:09 AM]
May 8, 2026 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5638051] [26-1893] (ASL) [Entered: 05/08/2026 10:11 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Arthur Senty-Haugen v. Minnesota DHS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen
Represented By: Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services
Represented By: Thomas Rolf Ragatz
Represented By: Brian Card
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Minnesota Sex Offender Program
Represented By: Thomas Rolf Ragatz
Represented By: Brian Card
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?