Irving Berry, Jr. v. Bill Armontrout
| Irving James Berry, Jr. |
| Bill M. Armontrout |
| 26-1960 |
| May 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MEMORANDUM of Petitioner Irving James Berry, Jr. in support of motion for successive habeas petition, filed by Irving James Berry, Jr. in 26-1960 , Doc No. [ # 5640772-2 ]. w/service 07/09/2026. [5659382] [26-1960] (RDB) [Entered: 07/09/2026 02:00 PM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to motion [ # 5640772-2 ] filed by Attorney Stephen David Hawke for Respondent Bill M. Armontrout , w/service 06/30/2026. [5656436] [26-1960] (SDH) [Entered: 06/30/2026 02:18 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - request for copy of successive habeas petition filed by Irving James Berry, Jr. w/service 06/25/2026. Copy of SHC petition sent to appellant this date. [5654875] [26-1960] (RDB) [Entered: 06/25/2026 01:45 PM] |
| Supporting Document regarding motion for successive habeas petition, filed by Irving James Berry, Jr. [ # 5640772-2 ], w/service 06/23/2026. [5653786] [26-1960] (CJO) [Entered: 06/23/2026 02:52 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5649796-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Stephen David Hawke. Response of Bill M. Armontrout due 06/30/2026. [5650222] [26-1960] (CJO) [Entered: 06/11/2026 02:18 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to motion for successive habeas petition, [ # 5640772-2 ], until 06/30/2026, filed by Attorney Stephen David Hawke for Respondent Bill M. Armontrout w/service 06/10/2026. [5649796] [26-1960] (SDH) [Entered: 06/10/2026 03:42 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to motion for successive habeas petition, [ # 5640772-2 ], until 06/12/2026, filed by Attorney Stephen David Hawke for Respondent Bill M. Armontrout w/service 05/26/2026. [5643914] [26-1960] (SDH) [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:09 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 5643914-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Stephen David Hawke. Response of Bill M. Armontrout due 06/12/2026. [5644052] [26-1960] (CJO) [Entered: 05/26/2026 04:11 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Stephen Hawke for Respondent Bill M. Armontrout w/service 05/21/2026 [5642791] [26-1960] (SDH) [Entered: 05/21/2026 01:21 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5640769] [26-1960] (CJO) [Entered: 05/15/2026 02:35 PM] |
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Irving James Berry, Jr., w/service 05/15/2026. Response of Bill M. Armontrout due 05/29/2026. [5640772] [26-1960] (CJO) [Entered: 05/15/2026 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Irving Berry, Jr. v. Bill Armontrout | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Irving James Berry, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Irving James Berry Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bill M. Armontrout | |
| Represented By: | Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General |
| Represented By: | Katherine Griesbach |
| Represented By: | Stephen David Hawke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
