James Tyson, Sr. v. Iowa Dept. of Corrections, et al
| James Charles Tyson, Sr. |
| Iowa Department of Corrections, Staff, Anamosa State Prison, Beth Skinner, Data Management Director, Nicholas Lamb, Brian Foster, Warden, Anamosa State Prison, Unknown, ASP Staff Members, Josh Baal, Unit Manager, Michelle Osterhaus, Case Manager and Mark Krugle, Grievance Officer |
| 26-1967 |
| May 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Prisoner case docketed. [5641251] [26-1967] (MMH) [Entered: 05/18/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Order on Complaints 3/17/26, Notice of Dismissal 4/29/26, notice of appeal, and docket entries [5641257] [26-1967] (MMH) [Entered: 05/18/2026 03:06 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to either 1) pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $605, or 2) to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, and to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order with the required pleading and motion within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 06/17/2026 [5641282] [26-1967] (MMH) [Entered: 05/18/2026 03:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
