Arick Johnson v. Barry Hyde, et al
| Arick Marquett Johnson |
| Barry Hyde, Administrator/County Judge, Pulaski County Administration, Eric Higgins, Sheriff/Jail Administrator, Pulaski County, Charles Hendrix, Chief Deputy, Pulaski County Jail, Rose, Major, Pulaski County, George Belt, Deputy, Pulaski County Jail and McClendon, Deputy, Pulaski County Jail |
| 26-2009 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Prisoner case docketed. [5643213] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:44 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Findings and Recommendation dated 1/5/2026, Order dated 3/31/2026, Judgment dated 3/31/2026 [5643221] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:49 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5643223] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
