Arick Johnson v. Barry Hyde, et al
| Arick Marquett Johnson |
| Barry Hyde, Administrator/County Judge, Pulaski County Administration, Eric Higgins, Sheriff/Jail Administrator, Pulaski County, Charles Hendrix, Chief Deputy, Pulaski County Jail, Rose, Major, Pulaski County, George Belt, Deputy, Pulaski County Jail and McClendon, Deputy, Pulaski County Jail |
| 26-2009 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Arick Marquett Johnson due 07/16/2026 [5657452] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 07/02/2026 01:41 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 05/28/2026 denying motion for rule 59(e) and 60(b), [5645036] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 05/28/2026 denying leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, [5645039] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:01 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to either 1) pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $605, or 2) to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, and to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order with the required pleading and motion within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 06/29/2026 [5645042] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/28/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5643213] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:44 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Findings and Recommendation dated 1/5/2026, Order dated 3/31/2026, Judgment dated 3/31/2026 [5643221] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:49 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5643223] [26-2009] (RDB) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
