United States v. Jesus Rodriguez
| United States of America |
| Jesus Rodriguez, also known as Migo |
| 26-2232 |
| June 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Attorney Alexander F. Reichert for Appellant Jesus Rodriguez for [ # 5669886-2 ] petition for enbanc rehearing and for rehearing by panel [ # 5669886-3 ] [26-2232] --[Edited 08/11/2026 by DAK to correct docket text.] (AFR) [Entered: 08/11/2026 02:20 PM] |
| PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Jesus Rodriguez w/service 08/07/2026 [5669886] [26-2232] (AFR) [Entered: 08/07/2026 11:35 AM] |
| ** DOCUMENT LOCKED **PETITION for initial Hearing En Banc filed by Appellant Jesus Rodriguez w/service 07/30/2026 [5667139] [26-2232] --[Edited 08/05/2026 by DAK to lock and resend notice.] COUNSEL IS ADVISED TO REFILE THIS PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC USING THE CORRECT EVENT. (AFR) [Entered: 07/30/2026 04:50 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and JANE KELLY Adp July 2026 [5661682] [26-2232] (DAK) [Entered: 07/16/2026 09:19 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Raymond W. Gruender, Jane Kelly in St. Louis [5661680] [26-2232] (DAK) [Entered: 07/16/2026 09:17 AM] |
| STATEMENT OF THE CASE filed by United States of America. w/Service 07/07/2026 [5658520] [26-2232] (MPK) [Entered: 07/07/2026 04:31 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Matthew P. Kopp for Appellee United States of America w/service 07/01/2026 [5656874] [26-2232] (MPK) [Entered: 07/01/2026 11:59 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Megan A. Healy for Appellee United States of America w/service 07/01/2026 [5656877] [26-2232] (MAH) [Entered: 07/01/2026 12:00 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF THE CASE filed by Jesus Rodriguez. w/Service 06/30/2026 [5656610] [26-2232] (AFR) [Entered: 06/30/2026 05:12 PM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5653551] [26-2232] (MMH) [Entered: 06/23/2026 11:03 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Mag. Judge Order denying motion for bail 10/6/25, Mag. Judge Order denying reconsideration 10/22/25, 2d Mag. Judge Order denying reconsideration 3/18/26, Order denying appeal of Mag. Judge Order 6/4/26, Rule 9a notice of appeal, and docket entries [5653580] [26-2232] (MMH) [Entered: 06/23/2026 11:18 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Appointing Alexander F. Reichert for Jesus Rodriguez under the Criminal Justice Act. [5653593] [26-2232] (MMH) [Entered: 06/23/2026 11:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Jesus Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Matthew P. Kopp |
| Represented By: | Dawn M. Deitz |
| Represented By: | Megan A. Healy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jesus Rodriguez, also known as Migo | |
| Represented By: | Jesus Rodriguez |
| Represented By: | Alexander F. Reichert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
