Earnest Pittman, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
Petitioner: Earnest Lee Pittman, Jr.
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons, FMC Rochester and Jared Rardin, Warden
Case Number: 26-2296
Filed: June 30, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2026 Prisoner case docketed. [5656193] [26-2296] (CBO) [Entered: 06/30/2026 09:47 AM]
June 30, 2026 Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Report and Recommendation filed 5/26/2026, Order Adopting R&R filed 6/16/2026, Judgment filed 6/16/2026, and Notice of Appeal filed 6/29/2026. [5656197] [26-2296] (CBO) [Entered: 06/30/2026 09:53 AM]
June 30, 2026 CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 07/28/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5656198] [26-2296] (CBO) [Entered: 06/30/2026 09:53 AM]
June 30, 2026 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5656199] [26-2296] (CBO) [Entered: 06/30/2026 09:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Earnest Pittman, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Earnest Lee Pittman, Jr.
Represented By: Earnest Lee Pittman Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Represented By: David W. Fuller
Represented By: Lucas B. Draisey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FMC Rochester
Represented By: David W. Fuller
Represented By: Lucas B. Draisey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jared Rardin, Warden
Represented By: David W. Fuller
Represented By: Lucas B. Draisey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?