NetChoice v. Michael Hilgers
| NetChoice |
| Michael Hilgers, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Nebraska |
| 26-2478 |
| July 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CROSS APPEAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 09/01/2026. Appendix due 09/11/2026. BRIEF APPELLANT, Michael Hilgers due 09/11/2026. Appellee/cross Appellant brief due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant's brief. [5664844] [26-2478, 26-2486] (CMH) [Entered: 07/24/2026 01:29 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5664468] [26-2478] (CMH) [Entered: 07/23/2026 03:02 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & Order 06/27/2026, and Docket Text Order 07/09/2026. [5664469] [26-2478] (CMH) [Entered: 07/23/2026 03:06 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 09/01/2026. Appendix due 09/11/2026. BRIEF APPELLANT, Michael Hilgers due 09/11/2026. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5664476] [26-2478] (CMH) [Entered: 07/23/2026 03:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Cody S. Barnett for Appellant Michael Hilgers w/service 07/23/2026 [5664558] [26-2478] (CSB) [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Lincoln J. Korell for Appellant Michael Hilgers w/service 07/23/2026 [5664561] [26-2478] (LJK) [Entered: 07/23/2026 04:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
