Monecia Smith v. Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, et al
| Monecia R. Smith |
| City of Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, Mark Tolbert, Cathy Dean, Dawn Cramer, Quinton Donald Lucas, Judge S. Margene Burnett, Det. Price, And all of the Kansas City, Missouri Officers, Detectives who were Involved in Obtaining or Executing a Search Warrant on the Residence of Plaintiff and who have not yet been identified, Major Thompson, All police officers and other employees of Kansas City Missouri Police, who went to the Residence of Plaintiff on January 13, 2022 and Social Workers of the Kansas City, MO Police Dept., Chaquita Byrd, Truman Medical Center, Inc., Richard Smith, former Police Chief and Stacey Graves, current Police Chief |
| 26-2530 |
| August 3, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGE ORDER: The motion to file the motion to recall the mandate out of time is granted [ # 5682084-2 ]. The motion to recall the mandate is denied [ # 5682048-2 ]. Adp Aug 2026 [5688840] [26-2530] (DAK) [Entered: 09/29/2026 01:45 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Brian J. Klopfenstein for Appellant Monecia R. Smith correcting [ # 5682048-2 ] motion to recall the mandate filed by Attorney. [5687416] [26-2530] (BJK) [Entered: 09/24/2026 12:40 PM] |
| MOTION to recall the mandate, filed by Attorney Brian J. Klopfenstein for Appellant Monecia R. Smith w/service 09/10/2026. [5682048] [26-2530] (BJK) [Entered: 09/10/2026 02:14 PM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under Rule 27, certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion to recall the mandate, [ # 5682048-2 ], submitted by Brian J. Klopfenstein in 26-2530 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [26-2530] (DAK) [Entered: 09/10/2026 02:29 PM] |
| MOTION Allowing Appellant to File Her Motion to Set Aside Mandate Out of Time, filed by Attorney Brian J. Klopfenstein for Appellant Monecia R. Smith w/service 09/10/2026. [5682084] [26-2530] (BJK) [Entered: 09/10/2026 02:38 PM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under Rule 27, certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion of Appellant to File Her Motion to Set Aside Mandate Out of Time, [ # 5682084-2 ], submitted by Brian J. Klopfenstein in 26-2530 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [26-2530] (DAK) [Entered: 09/10/2026 03:36 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5676406] [26-2530] (DAK) [Entered: 08/26/2026 11:20 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely. JANE KELLY, DUANE BENTON and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Aug 2026 [5668237] [26-2530] (DAK) [Entered: 08/04/2026 10:43 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5667677] [26-2530] (CJO) [Entered: 08/03/2026 09:53 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order Remanding to State Court 01/29/2024, and Text Order Denying Motion for Leave to File 04/07/2026.[5667687] [26-2530] (CJO) [Entered: 08/03/2026 10:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
