Congressman Robert Onder, et al v. State of Missouri, et al
| Congressman Robert Onder, Richard Ray Brattin, Patricia Thomas and Debra Havens |
| State of Missouri and Denny L. Hoskins, in his official capacity as Missouri Secretary of State |
| Richard Von Glahn and People Not Politicians |
| 26-2827 |
| September 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Voting |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ARGUMENT RESPONSE/APPEARANCE FORM filed by Marc Henry Ellinger for Richard Ray Brattin, Debra Havens, Robert Onder and Patricia Thomas and Cole David Bradbury for Richard Ray Brattin, Debra Havens, Robert Onder and Patricia Thomas in 26-2827 for argument in September, at the Tele/Video Conference in Other. [5683319] [26-2827, 26-2797] (CDB) [Entered: 09/14/2026 02:37 PM] |
| SET FOR ARGUMENT - CASE PLACED ON CALENDAR - for Argument Via Videoconference on Thursday, September 17, 2026. To be heard before Judges James B. Loken, David R. Stras and Justin D. Smith in Division I. The courtroom deputy will be Melissa. All attorneys presenting oral argument must complete a Response Form. # Click Here to Complete the Oral Argument Response Form . # Click Here for the Complete Calendar PLEASE REVIEW THE ENTIRE CALENDAR CAREFULLY, PARTICULARLY THE COUNSEL NOTICE PAGE. [5682963] [26-2797, 26-2827] (MR) [Entered: 09/14/2026 10:06 AM] |
| ARGUMENT RESPONSE/APPEARANCE FORM filed by Louis Joseph Capozzi, III for Denny L. Hoskins and State of Missouri in 26-2797, Louis Joseph Capozzi, III for State of Missouri and Denny L. Hoskins in 26-2827 Louis J. Capozzi, III for argument in September, at the Tele/Video Conference in St. Louis, Missouri. [5683369] [26-2797, 26-2827] (LJC) [Entered: 09/14/2026 03:15 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5682632] [26-2827] (EDG) [Entered: 09/11/2026 01:36 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of cross-appeal, docket entries and Memorandum and Order dated 9/8/26. [5682647] [26-2827] (EDG) [Entered: 09/11/2026 01:50 PM] |
| MOTION to consolidate cases., filed by Attorney Cole David Bradbury for Appellants Richard Ray Brattin, Debra Havens, Robert Onder and Patricia Thomas in 26-2827, Attorney Cole David Bradbury for Appellees Robert Onder, Richard Ray Brattin, Patricia Thomas and Debra Havens in 26-2797 w/service 09/11/2026. [5682664] [26-2827, 26-2797] (CDB) [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:15 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The following expedited schedule shall apply to briefing and arguing the merits of this appeal. Briefing: Simultaneous briefs on the merits of the appeal are due by close of business Tuesday, September 15, 2026. Any party wishing to file a separate appendix must do so by the close of business on Tuesday, September 15, 2026. No overlength brief will be accepted for filing. No extension of time to file this brief will be granted. Any request to file an amicus brief and the brief are due at this time. Oral Argument: Oral argument will be conducted remotely with the judges in chambers on Thursday, September 17, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. Central time. There will be one argument for 26-2797 and 26-2827 with the time limits set forth below: Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross Appellants: 10 minutes Defendants State and Secretary of State: 10 minutes Intervenor-Appellants/Cross Appellees: 20 minutes [5682668] [26-2827] (EDG) [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:23 PM] |
| Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Richard Ray Brattin, Debra Havens, Robert Onder and Patricia Thomas in 26-2827, Appellees Richard Ray Brattin, Debra Havens, Robert Onder and Patricia Thomas in 26-2797. No Transcript[5682708] [26-2827, 26-2797] (CDB) [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.