Willliam O'Tool v. Kelly Morriss
| Willliam C O'Tool |
| Kelly Morriss, Warden |
| 26-2841 |
| September 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5683394] [26-2841] (RDB) [Entered: 09/14/2026 03:40 PM] |
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Willliam C O'Tool w/service 09/14/2026. Response of Kelly Morriss due 09/28/2026. [5683420] [26-2841] (RDB) [Entered: 09/14/2026 03:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Willliam O'Tool v. Kelly Morriss | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Willliam C O'Tool | |
| Represented By: | Willliam C. O'Tool |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kelly Morriss, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General |
| Represented By: | Stephen David Hawke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
