Cody Kern v. Direct Care/Treatment Exec. Bd., et al
| Cody Raymond Kern |
| Direct Care and Treatment Executive Board and State of Minnesota |
| 26-2844 |
| September 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECORD FILED - MOTION TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: Transcript of Motion Hearing at District Court document #87 [Only Electronic Copy Received - No Paper Copy on File]. Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 06/17/2025, No. of Pgs.: 50, Court Reporter: Nat, Caitlin. [5684320] [26-2844] (BNW) [Entered: 09/16/2026 11:43 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5683625] [26-2844] (MMH) [Entered: 09/15/2026 09:26 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Order on defendants' motion for summary judgment (placeholder for sealed doc, filed separately) 8/11/26, CV Judgment 8/11/26, Order on defendants' motion for summary judgment (REDACTED) 9/8/26, notice of appeal, and docket entries [5683638] [26-2844] (MMH) [Entered: 09/15/2026 09:40 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of court order of 08/11/2026 (sealed) granting defendants' motion for summary judgment [5683644] [26-2844] (MMH) [Entered: 09/15/2026 09:45 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 10/26/2026. Appendix due 11/04/2026. BRIEF APPELLANT Cody Raymond Kern due 11/04/2026 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5683648] [26-2844] (MMH) [Entered: 09/15/2026 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
