Jessica Schmidt v. DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc., et al
| Jessica A. Schmidt |
| DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson |
| 26-2894 |
| September 18, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellants DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson in 26-2799, Appellees DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson in 26-2894 - w/service 09/23/2026. [5687182] [26-2799, 26-2894] (DSM) [Entered: 09/23/2026 06:59 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellants DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson in 26-2799, Appellees DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson in 26-2894 - Separate Appendix - w/service 09/23/2026 [5687183] [26-2799, 26-2894] (DSM) [Entered: 09/23/2026 07:08 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5685609] [26-2894] (ASL) [Entered: 09/18/2026 02:20 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of cross-appeal filed 9/17/2026, Order filed 8/5/2026, Judgment filed 8/26/2026, and docket entries, [5685624] [26-2894] (ASL) [Entered: 09/18/2026 02:25 PM] |
| CROSS APPEAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 10/19/2026. Appendix due 10/29/2026. BRIEF APPELLANT, DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson due 10/29/2026. Appellee/cross Appellant brief due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant's brief. [5685662] [26-2799, 26-2894] (ASL) [Entered: 09/18/2026 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
