Rebecca Payne, et al v. Nathan Rice, et al
| Jordan L. King, James L. Crowder and Rebecca J. Payne, personally, and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Noah Hunter Brittain |
| John Staley, Lonoke County Sheriff, Nathan Rice and Michael C. Davis |
| 26-3225 |
| October 29, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-3225: paid - cs] Notified by the district court of filing fee paid 10/30/2026.[5701178] [26-3225] (CJO) [Entered: 11/02/2026 08:45 AM] |
| CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 12/09/2026. Appendix due 12/21/2026. BRIEF APPELLANTS, Nathan Rice, John Staley and Michael C. Davis due 12/21/2026. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5700811] [26-3225, 26-3242] (CJO) [Entered: 10/30/2026 10:49 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5700279] [26-3225] (CJO) [Entered: 10/29/2026 10:42 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Opinion and Order 09/30/2026, and Order 10/26/2026.[5700282] [26-3225] (CJO) [Entered: 10/29/2026 10:46 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 12/08/2026. Appendix due 12/18/2026. BRIEF APPELLANT, Nathan Rice and John Staley due 12/18/2026. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5700284] [26-3225] (CJO) [Entered: 10/29/2026 10:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.