Matthew Young v. Intel Corporation, et al
| MATTHEW ROBERT YOUNG |
| INTEL CORPORATION and STEVE JOBS |
| 09-35790 |
| September 2, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MANDATE ISSUED. (ATG, PAR and JBR) [7183132] (SW) |
| Filing 7 Order filed (ALFRED T. GOODWIN, PAMELA ANN RYMER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) A review of the record, the opening brief and the response to the September 17, 2009 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED. . [7161817] (KKW) |
| Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk RS) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [7101032] (RS) |
| Filing 6 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Matthew Robert Young (Informal: Yes) opening brief of 10 pages. Served on 10/08/2009. [7101096] (GLS) |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Matthew Robert Young motion to show cause why this appeal should be alloweed to proceed. Served on 09/01/2009. [7084880] (MT) |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 09/28/2009. [7084850] (MT) |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Summary disposition and prisoner authorization osc. [7065302] (CKP) |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PROSE APPELLANT. NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Matthew Robert Young opening brief due 10/13/2009. [7049382] (GR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
