USA v. William Ruehle
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| WILLIAM J. RUEHLE |
| 09-50161 |
| March 26, 2009 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 44 MANDATE ISSUED.(RCF, RMG and RCT) [7132110] (RR) [Entered: 11/16/2009 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 43 Filed order (RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied. [7119936] (SC) [Entered: 11/05/2009 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 42 Filed order (RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) Defendant-Appellant William J. Ruehle's Motion to Vacate Panel Opinion and Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED. Consequently, the United States' Motion to Expedite Consideration is DENIED AS MOOT as to the Motion to Vacate and is DENIED as to expediting the Petition for Rehearing, which will be decided in the ordinary course. IT IS SO ORDERED. [7101988] (SC) [Entered: 10/21/2009 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 41 Filed (ECF) Appellant USA Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 10/18/2009. [7098517] (Levin, Daniel) [Entered: 10/18/2009 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Appellant USA response opposing motion (Motion (ECF Filing) ,Motion (ECF Filing) motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 10/17/2009. [7098512] (Levin, Daniel) [Entered: 10/17/2009 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 39 Filed (ECF) Appellee William J. Ruehle petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc (from 09/30/2009 opinion). Date of service: 10/12/2009. [7091722] (Umhofer, Matthew) [Entered: 10/12/2009 09:17 PM] |
| Filing 38 Filed (ECF) Appellee William J. Ruehle Motion for miscellaneous relief [William J. Ruehle's Motion to Vacate Panel Opinion and Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction ]. Date of service: 10/09/2009. [7091194] (Umhofer, Matthew) [Entered: 10/09/2009 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 37 FILED OPINION (RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD C. TALLMAN) REVERSED AND REMANDED. Judge: RCT Authoring. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [7079255] (RMM) [Entered: 09/30/2009 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 36 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO RAYMOND C. FISHER, RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD C. TALLMAN. [7047876] (LN) [Entered: 09/01/2009 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 35 Filed EX PARTE and UNDER SEAL original and 10 copies of Appellee William J. Ruehle's answering brief of 57 pages. Served on 08/11/2009 (revised redacted version per 8/10/09 order). (Received on 7/17/09, Panel already served.) [7023304] (LA) [Entered: 08/11/2009 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 34 Filed (ECF) Appellee William J. Ruehle Correspondence: Certificate of Service to Answering Brief of William J. Ruehle [revised redacted] Filed Under Seal. Date of service: 08/11/2009 [7022702] (Umhofer, Matthew) [Entered: 08/11/2009 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 33 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:SC): Appellee has filed a motion for clarification of the Order dated August 3, 2009, which is amended as follows: Appellee is hereby ordered to immediately serve upon Appellant the answering brief filed under seal, removing all redactions except: (1) the previously redacted text in the block quote on page 8; (2) the last sentence of the block quote on page 9, footnote 2; and (3) the previously redacted sentence in the block quote on page 10, of his answering brief. Except as modified here, the terms of the Order dated August 3, 2009, remain in effect. [7021255] (SC) [Entered: 08/10/2009 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 32 ENTRY UPDATED. Filed UNDER SEAL Appellee William J. Ruehle motion for clarification of order Served on 08/06/2009. [7020441] (Panel) (NEW) [Entered: 08/07/2009 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 31 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:SC): Appellees Motion for leave not to serve the sealed answering brief and sealed excerpt of record on Appellant is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Appellees Motion is denied with respect to the sealed answering brief, and Appellee is hereby ordered to immediately serve upon Appellant the unredacted answering brief filed under seal. Because the sealed excerpts of record do contain privileged communications, Appellees Motion to file them under seal is granted to that limited extent. [7013772] (SC) [Entered: 08/03/2009 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 30 Received 10 paper copies of Reply brief [ # 27 ] filed by USA in 09-50161. One copy to Case Files, the remainder to Records. [7013257] (SD) [Entered: 08/03/2009 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 28 Filed clerk order: Reply Brief [ # 27 ] filed by USA. Within 5 working days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 10 copies of the brief in paper format, with a Grey cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [7010779] (LA) [Entered: 07/30/2009 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 27 Submitted (ECF) Reply brief for review. Submitted by Appellant USA. Date of service: 07/30/2009. [7010683] (Levin, Daniel) [Entered: 07/30/2009 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 26 UPDATED CASE CALENDARED: 09/01/2009 9:30 AM Pasadena, CA Courtroom 1 [7003255] (AW) [Entered: 07/24/2009 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 24 Notice of Oral Argument on SEPTEMBER Calendar. Please return ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF HEARING NOTICE form to: PASADENA Office. Attention: The Notice of Docket Activity may not list your case number. Please open attached documents to view details about your case. [7002761] (LN) [Entered: 07/24/2009 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 29 Filed UNDER SEAL Appellee William J. Ruehle supplemental excerpts of record on appeal in 1 volume (received 7/17/09, already sent to Panel). [7011234] (LA) [Entered: 07/31/2009 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 23 Received 10 paper copies of REDACTED version of Answering brief [ # 15 ] filed by William J. Ruehle in 09-50161. One copy to Case Files, the remainder to Records. [6998235] (SD) [Entered: 07/21/2009 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellee William J. Ruehle Motion for miscellaneous relief [ Motion of Appellee William J. Ruehle for Leave Not to Serve the Sealed Answering Brief and Sealed Excerpt of Record ]. Date of service: 07/20/2009. [6996822] (Umhofer, Matthew) [Entered: 07/20/2009 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 21 Filed (ECF) Appellee William J. Ruehle Correspondence: Certificate of Service to Motion of Appellee Ruehle to File Under Seal. Date of service: 07/20/2009 [6996808] (Umhofer, Matthew) [Entered: 07/20/2009 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 20 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:JF): By order of one judge on the panel, the motion of appellee to file under seal appellees answering brief, and the excerpt of record containing materials filed or submitted in camera and under seal with the district court, including the transcripts of the evidentiary hearing held in closed session on February 23, 2009 and February 24, 2009, is GRANTED. [6996601] (KKW) [Entered: 07/20/2009 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 19 Filed Appellee William J. Ruehle supplemental excerpts of record on appeal in 2 volumes. (FedEx to Panel) [6996025] (LA) [Entered: 07/17/2009 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 18 Received UNDER SEAL original and 10 copies of Appellee William J. Ruehle's answering brief of 57 pages. SEALED Supplemental Excerpts of record in 1 volume. Deficiency: No certificate of service. Other deficiencies: Motion to file brief under seal pending. Notified counsel. (FedEx to Panel) [6995964] (LA) [Entered: 07/17/2009 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 17 Received Appellee William J. Ruehle's motion to file Answering brief and sealed volume of supplemental excerpts of record UNDER SEAL; no service date. (Panel) [6995948] (LA) [Entered: 07/17/2009 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed clerk order: REDACTED version of Answering Brief [ # 15 ] filed by William J. Ruehle. Within 5 working days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 10 copies of the brief in paper format, with a Red cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. [6995641] (LA) [Entered: 07/17/2009 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 15 Submitted (ECF) Answering brief for review. Submitted by Appellee William J. Ruehle. Date of service: 07/16/2009. [6994740]--[COURT replaced document with searchable version, attached amended certificate of compliance --07/16/2009 by MA] (Umhofer, Matthew) [Entered: 07/16/2009 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 14 CALENDARED: 09/01/2009 9:30 AM Pasadena, CA Courtroom 1 [6979585] [08-50369, 08-50382, 08-56085, 08-50319, 09-50161, 09-55155] (AM) [Entered: 07/02/2009 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 13 Calendar materials being prepared. [6976021] [08-50369, 08-50382, 08-56085, 08-50319, 09-50161, 09-55155] (AM) [Entered: 07/01/2009 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 12 Received 10 paper copies of Opening brief [ # 6 ] filed by USA in 09-50161. One copy to Case Files, the remainder to Records. [6970684] (SD) [Entered: 06/26/2009 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk:LBS): The government's motion for expedition is granted. Appellee's motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The answering brief is due July 16, 2009. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. See Fed. R. App. P. 31(a)(1). Any further Rule 31-2.2(b) request is strongly disfavored. This case shall be placed on the September 2009 calendar. [6960828] (SC) [Entered: 06/18/2009 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee William J. Ruehle Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 07/16/2009. Date of service: 06/03/2009. [6943137] (Umhofer, Matthew) [Entered: 06/03/2009 07:37 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant USA excerpts of record in 4 volumes. Served on 05/27/2009 (LA) [Entered: 05/29/2009 05:02 PM] |
| Filed clerk order: Opening Brief [ # 6 ] filed by USA. Within 5 working days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 10 copies of the brief in paper format, with a Blue cover, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. (LA) [Entered: 05/29/2009 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 8 Added attorney Michael J. Raphael for USA, in case 09-50161. (MA) [Entered: 05/27/2009 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant USA Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 05/27/2009. [6934601] (Levin, Daniel) [Entered: 05/27/2009 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 Submitted (ECF) Opening brief for review. Submitted by Appellant USA. Date of service: 05/27/2009. [6934597] (Levin, Daniel) [Entered: 05/27/2009 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added attorney Daniel Benjamin Levin for USA (JFF) [Entered: 05/27/2009 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel B. Levin for Appellant USA. Date of service: 05/27/2009. [6934231] (Levin, Daniel) [Entered: 05/27/2009 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed certificate of record on appeal. RT filed in DC 05/13/2009 (JFF) [Entered: 05/15/2009 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of transcript designation and ordering form filed in DC. (JFF) [Entered: 05/07/2009 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Filed in District Court on 03/26/2009. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: N/A. Transcript shall be ordered by 04/15/2009 for Appellant United States of America. Transcript shall be filed by 05/06/2009. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 05/27/2009 for United States of America. Appellee brief due 06/16/2009 for William J. Ruehle. Appellant reply brief due by 06/30/2009 for United States of America (JN) [Entered: 03/26/2009 02:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
