Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Kearny v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv00723
Defendant: Chenming C. Hu, William J. Ruehle, Nicholas E. Brathwaite and others
Plaintiff: Steven Kearny
Rosenfeld v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv00486
Defendant: William J. Ruehle, Nicholas E. Brathwaite, Dr. Ford Tamer and others
Plaintiff: Berel Rosenfeld
Poe v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00050
Defendant: Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle, David Liddle and others
Plaintiff: Nelson Poe
Jones v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00107
Defendant: Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle, David Liddle and others
Plaintiff: Wayne Jones
Cohen v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00082
Defendant: Chenming C. Hu, Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle and others
Plaintiff: Austin Cohen
McIntosh v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv11090
Defendant: Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle, David Liddle and others
Plaintiff: Tehya McIntosh
Wang v. Inphi Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv09332
Defendant: Dr. Ford Tamer, William J. Ruehle, Elissa Murphy and others
Plaintiff: Elaine Wang
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 4:2020cv02918
Plaintiff: Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell, Michelle Knight and others
Defendant: Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 1:2020cv00345
Defendant: Greg Abbott, Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services and others
Plaintiff: Steven Hotze, Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell and others
Petitioner: Alice Aten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Ruehle, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 11-70358
: In re: WILLIAM J. RUEHLE, HENRY T. NICHOLAS, III and HENRY SAMUELI
Petitioner: WILLIAM J. RUEHLE, HENRY T. NICHOLAS, III and HENRY SAMUELI
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest: L. A. MURPHY, Derivatively on Behalf of Broadcom Corp

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?