In re: Stefan Rest, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
| EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., TATUNG COMPANY, SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD., CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC., NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LIMITED, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD., MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.), INC., PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SHARP CORPORATION, NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., CHI MEI CORPORATION, NEC CORPORATION, HITACHI LTD., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD. |
| In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation |
| STEFAN REST |
| INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS |
| 12-16788 |
| August 14, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Antitrust |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 69 Filed (ECF) Appellant CBC, Inc. in 13-15920 Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 06/13/2014. [9131048] [13-15920, 13-15916, 12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 13-15917, 13-15930, 13-16216, 14-15916] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 06/13/2014 07:16 AM] |
| Filing 68 Filed (ECF) Appellant Margot Bradley in 13-15917 Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 06/13/2014. [9131046] [13-15917, 13-15916, 12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 13-15920, 13-15930, 13-16216, 14-15916] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 06/13/2014 07:15 AM] |
| Filing 67 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alex Martinez in 13-15916 Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 06/13/2014. [9131045] [13-15916, 12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 13-15917, 13-15920, 13-15930, 13-16216, 14-15916] (Crabtree, John) [Entered: 06/13/2014 07:12 AM] |
| Filing 66 Filed (ECF) Appellants Barbara Cochran, Kevin Luke, Gerri Marshall, Maria Marshall, Wayne Marshall and Geri Maxwell in 13-15930 Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 06/12/2014. [9130782] [13-15930, 13-15916, 12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 13-15917, 13-15920, 13-16216, 14-15916] (Pentz, John) [Entered: 06/12/2014 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 65 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MAC) Appellants motion to voluntarily dismiss these appeals is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [9127933] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 13-16793] (SAM) [Entered: 06/11/2014 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 64 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788 Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 06/10/2014. [9126185] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 06/10/2014 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 63 Terminated Kimberly Linnell Taylor for Epson Imaging Devices Corporation in 12-16780, Epson Imaging Devices Corporation in 12-16782 and Epson Imaging Devices Corporation in 12-16788 (csl no longer with firm) [9054601] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (ASW) [Entered: 04/11/2014 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 62 ENTRY UPDATED. Streamlined request [60] by Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780 to extend time to file the brief is not approved because [9054140] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788]--[Edited 04/10/2014 by CB] (CB) [Entered: 04/10/2014 06:06 PM] |
| Filing 61 Streamlined request [60] by - TAppellant Erwin to extend time to file the brief is not approved because late [9054139] (CB) [Entered: 04/10/2014 05:59 PM] |
| Filing 60 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780. New requested due date is 05/16/2014. [9053125] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 04/10/2014 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 59 ENTRY UPDATED. Streamlined request [60] by Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780 to extend time to file the brief is not approved because [9052842] [12-16782, 12-16780, 12-16788]--[Edited 04/10/2014 by CB] --[Edited 05/13/2014 by ASW] (BJK) [Entered: 04/10/2014 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 58 Streamlined request [57] by Appellant Ira Conner Erwin to extend time to file the brief is not approved because the request is untimely. [9052788] (BJK) [Entered: 04/10/2014 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 57 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780. New requested due date is 05/19/2014 at 11:59 pm. [9050448] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 04/09/2014 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 56 Terminated Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation in 12-16780, Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation in 12-16782 and Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation in 12-16788 [8987731] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (HH) [Entered: 02/21/2014 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 55 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CB): The motion of Koninklije Philips Electronics NV and Philips Electronics North America to amend the caption is granted. These entities shall be removed from the case caption. [8987646] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (SAM) [Entered: 02/21/2014 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 54 Filed (ECF) Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation in 12-16780 Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Amend the Caption]. Date of service: 01/30/2014. [8959450] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Cullen, Brendan) [Entered: 01/30/2014 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 53 Attorneys Matthew Scott Fitzwater substituted by Attorneys Brendan Peter Cullen [8959020] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 01/30/2014 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 52 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Brendan P. Cullen for Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation in 12-16780. Date of service: 01/30/2014. [8958952] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Cullen, Brendan) [Entered: 01/30/2014 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 51 Terminated participation of Court Reporter James Jonathan Yeomans in this case. [8782340] [12-16788, 12-16780, 12-16782] (ASW) [Entered: 09/13/2013 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 50 Filed order MEDIATION (MAC): An in-person mediation conference will be held on Thursday, September 19, 2013, beginning at 9:00 a.m., at the James R. Browning United States Courthouse, 95 Seventh Street, Suite 109, San Francisco, California [contact: (415) 355-7900]. [8765330] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 13-15915, 13-15916, 13-15917, 13-15920, 13-15930, 13-15934, 13-16216] (KKW) [Entered: 09/03/2013 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 49 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner)Appellants opposed motion for a new briefing schedule is denied. The amended notices of appeal, filed April 5, 2013, clearly evidence an intent to appeal from the district courts final order entered April 3, 2013. The Clerk shall forward appellants amended notices of appeal, filed April 5, 2013, to the district court for filing as timely notices of appeal of the district courts April 3, 2013 order. See Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248-249 (1992); Rabin v. Cohen, 570 F.2d 864, 866 (9th Cir. 1978). Briefing is completed. (MOATT) [8759510] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (KKW) [Entered: 08/28/2013 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 48 Terminated Sean David Unger for Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16780, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16782 and Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16788 [8756853] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 08/26/2013 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 47 Received Appellee Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788 letter dated re: removal of counsel Sean Unger. [8756850] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 08/26/2013 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 46 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788 reply to response (,motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies), ). Date of service: 08/15/2013. [8744713] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 08/15/2013 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 45 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class in 12-16780 response opposing motion (,motion for miscellaneous relief (to be used only if no other relief applies)). Date of service: 08/08/2013. [8735325] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Shulman, Daniel) [Entered: 08/08/2013 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 44 Added attorney Daniel Rees Shulman for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16780 Daniel Rees Shulman for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16782 Daniel Rees Shulman for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16788. [8734129] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 08/07/2013 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 43 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel R. Shulman for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class in 12-16780. Date of service: 08/07/2013. [8733898] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Shulman, Daniel) [Entered: 08/07/2013 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 42 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788 Correspondence: additional exhibit for Motion for New Briefing Schedule (Dkt 41) filed yesterday. Date of service: 07/30/2013 [8722827] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 07/30/2013 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 41 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788 Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for New Briefing Schedule]. Date of service: 07/29/2013. [8721133] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 07/29/2013 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. in 12-16780 Correspondence: Correspondence to Clerk re: Notice of Settlement in Underlying Case. Date of service: 06/11/2013 [8663898] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Kronenberg, Chet) [Entered: 06/11/2013 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 39 ENTRY UPDATED. ORIGINAL TEXT: Streamlined request [38] by Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Stefan Rest reply brief due 08/02/2013. [8651891] [12-16788, 12-16780, 12-16782] |
| Filing 38 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788. New requested due date is 08/02/2013 at 04:00 pm. [8651392] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 06/03/2013 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 37 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [ # 34 ] filed by Indirect Plaintiff Class. [8614895] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (SD) [Entered: 05/03/2013 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 36 Filed Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class in 12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 34 ] in 1 volume. [8614307] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (RH) [Entered: 05/02/2013 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 35 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 34 ] submitted by Indirect Plaintiff Class in 12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788 is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the supplemental excerpts of record [ # 34 ] submitted by Indirect Plaintiff Class. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8612194] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (RH) [Entered: 05/01/2013 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 34 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief and supplemental excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class in 12-16780. Date of service: 05/01/2013. [8612161] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 05/01/2013 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 33 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court filed by Stefan Rest [8610310] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 04/30/2013 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 32 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [8582656]--[COURT UPDATE: To replace PDF; resent NDA - 04/11/2013 by HH] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 04/09/2013 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 31 Received 7 paper copies of Opening brief [ # 28 ] filed by Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Stefan Rest in 12-16788. [8577605] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (SD) [Entered: 04/04/2013 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 30 Filed Appellant Ira Conner Erwin, Luis Mario Santana, and Stefan Rest paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 28 ] in 5 volume(s). [8577449] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (RH) [Entered: 04/04/2013 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 29 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 28 ] submitted by Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Stefan Rest in 12-16788 is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the excerpts of record [ # 28 ] submitted by appellants. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8571738] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (RH) [Entered: 04/01/2013 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 28 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief and excerpts of record for review. Submitted by Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788. Date of service: 04/01/2013. [8571146] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 04/01/2013 07:16 AM] |
| Filing 27 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants motion for remand and motion for sanctions under 28 U.S.C. 1927 is denied. Class plaintiff appellees motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute and for determination of frivolous appeal is denied. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the consolidated opening brief is due April 1, 2013; the consolidated answering brief is due May 1, 2013; and the consolidated optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. (MOATT) [8534190] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (KKW) [Entered: 03/01/2013 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 26 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788 reply to response (,motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute under Circuit Rule 42-1,motion for sanctions, ,motion to remand case,motion for sanctions). Date of service: 01/21/2013. [8480961] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 01/21/2013 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 25 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class in 12-16780 Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1), Motion for sanctions and Response opposing motion (,motion to remand case,motion for sanctions). Date of service: 01/14/2013. [8472879] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 01/14/2013 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ira Conner Erwin in 12-16780, Appellant Luis Mario Santana in 12-16782, Appellant Stefan Rest in 12-16788 Motion to remand case, Motion for sanctions. Date of service: 01/03/2013. [8458933] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 01/03/2013 06:46 AM] |
| Filing 23 Added attorney John Bogdanov for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16788. [8432774] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 12/10/2012 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John D. Bogdanov for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432366] (Bogdanov, John) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 21 Added attorney Josef Cooper, Tracy Rena Kirkham for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16788. [8432247] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 20 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tracy R. Kirkham for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432166] (Kirkham, Tracy) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 19 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Josef D. Cooper for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432007] (Cooper, Josef) [Entered: 12/10/2012 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 18 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants opposed corrected motion to consolidate appeals is granted. Nos. 12-16780, 12-16782, and 12-16788 shall proceed as consolidated appeals. The amended briefing schedule is as follows: the consolidated opening brief is due January 9, 2013; the consolidated answering brief is due February 8, 2013; and the consolidated optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. Appellants opposed motion to stay appellate proceedings is denied. Appellees motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute is denied. Appellees request for further relief regarding the conduct of appellants counsel is also denied without prejudice to raising the issue in the answering brief. Appellant is reminded that the typeface of a motion should comply with the requirements of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(d)(1)(E). (Pro Mo) [8425762] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (WL) [Entered: 12/05/2012 08:01 AM] |
| Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class response opposing motion (,motion to consolidate cases). Date of service: 11/28/2012. [8418595] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 11/28/2012 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 16 Deleted Incorrect Entry (Order Filed in Wrong Case - Will be filed in Correct Case 12-16877) f [8415292] (SAM) [Entered: 11/27/2012 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 15 Added attorney Patrick B. Clayton for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16788. [8414696] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 11/26/2012 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick B. Clayton for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 11/26/2012. [8414547] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 11/26/2012 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellant Stefan Rest Corrected Motion to consolidate cases 12-16780 and 12-16782. Date of service: 11/20/2012. [8408380] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 11/20/2012 07:25 AM] |
| Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 13 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Stefan Rest Motion to consolidate cases 12-16780 12-16782 12-16788. Date of service: 11/16/2012. [8406083] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 11/16/2012 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed order MEDIATION (BS):Due to a court docketing error, the caption of the order filed November 2, 2012, scheduling a dial-in settlement assessment conference call to discuss possible resolution of the appeals arising from the settlement of the Apple IPhone 4 Products Liability Litigation, incorrectly included appeals related to the TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation. The dial-in settlement assessment conference call, currently scheduled for Tuesday, November 13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time), will address only the appeals related to the Apple IPhone 4 Products Liability Litigation, Docket Nos. 12-16994, 12-17004 and 12-17005. No settlement assessment conference has been scheduled at this time to address the TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation. Circuit Mediator Peter W. Sherwood (Peter_Sherwood@ca9.uscourts.gov) will conduct the conference call on November 13, 2012. On or before November 9, 2012, all counsel to appeal nos. 12-16994, 12-17004 and 12-17005 who intend to participate in the conference shall provide their names and contact information to the Mediation Assistant at Elisa_Monterola@ca9.uscourts.gov. The dial-in information previously provided remains unchanged. [8391307] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 12-16830, 12-16839, 12-16994, 12-17004, 12-17005] (KKW) [Entered: 11/07/2012 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order MEDIATION (BS): The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone settlement assessment conference, with counsel only, on November 13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time) to discuss whether this case is appropriate for participation in the Mediation Program. Dial-in information is available to counsel of record as a separate document attached to the electronic filing notification of this order. If any counsel of record is not able to access the dial-in information, please notify the Mediation Assistant immediately at Beatriz_Smith@ca9.uscourts.gov. On or before November 8, 2012, the parties shall provide the name and contact information of all counsel intending to participate in the conference to Beatriz_Smith@ca9.uscourts.gov. [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 12-16830, 12-16839, 12-16994, 12-17004, 12-17005] [8385659] (KKW) [Entered: 11/02/2012 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Stefan Rest Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/18/2012. [8367923] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 10/18/2012 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 Terminated Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America in 12-16788 [8366191] (KKW) [Entered: 10/18/2012 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AMT):The Court is in receipt of the letter sent by attorney Stephen H. Sutro dated September 27, 2012. This letter is construed as a motion to amend the caption. So construed, the motion is granted. The Clerk shall remove NEC Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., Renesas Electronics America, NEC Corporation of America and NEC Electronics Corporation (collectively, NEC) as appellees. Attorney Sutro is reminded that an application for relief is to be requested by a motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 27(a)(1). The opening brief remains due November 19, 2012. [8366186] (KKW) [Entered: 10/18/2012 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (EPM): The court has been informed that appellants are now represented by counsel, and is therefore required to file a Mediation Questionnaire in accordance with Circuit Rule 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing of this order, appellants shall: (a) file a Mediation Questionnaire (available on the court's website, www.ca9.uscourts.gov); (b) dismiss the appeal voluntarily pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); or (c) show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [8355683] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 12-17004, 12-17005] (KKW) [Entered: 10/11/2012 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received copy of District Court order filed on 10/01/2012 order denying defendant's motion to certify under 28 USC 1292. [8345446] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 10/02/2012 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America Correspondence: Request to be Removed from Docket. Date of service: 09/27/2012 [8340062] (Sutro, Stephen) [Entered: 09/27/2012 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added attorney Christopher Andres Bandas for Stefan Rest, in case 12-16788. [8317079] (Turcios, Margoth) [Entered: 09/10/2012 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Christopher A. Bandas for Appellant Stefan Rest. Date of service: 09/10/2012. [8316527] (Bandas, Christopher) [Entered: 09/10/2012 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PROSE APPELLANT. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 09/10/2012. Transcript due 10/09/2012. Appellant Stefan Rest opening brief due 11/19/2012. Appellees AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chimei Innolux Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Indirect Plaintiff Class, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Limited, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Renesas Electronics America, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., LTD. and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. answering brief due 12/18/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8287041] (GR) [Entered: 08/14/2012 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
