Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Compucom Systems Inc et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02948
Defendant:
NEC Display Solutions of America Inc, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
CompuCom Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv05875
Defendant:
NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Neco Alliance LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05831
Defendant:
NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Neco Alliance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05827
Defendant:
NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, ABC Appliance, Inc. and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16412
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
SHANNON CASHION, W. CHRISTOPHER MCDONOUGH and KELLY KRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16361
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
DAVID C. MARLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16364
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
BARBARA COCHRAN, JAMES GLASE and BRYAN MARCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16360
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
NORMAN D. PALMER and ESTATE OF FERN COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
The Indirect Purchaser Settlem, et al v. Samsung Electronics Company Lt, et al
as 14-16342
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THE INDIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS and THE GOVERNMENT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASSES
Objector - Appellant:
SEAN KENNETH HULL, RAYMOND FRANCIS CAMPBELL and SUPEROXYGEN, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD., WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG and others
In re: Ira Connor, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-16793
:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Objector - Appellant:
IRA CONNOR ERWIN, LUIS MARIO SANTANA and STEFAN REST
Defendant - Appellee:
LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SHARP CORPORATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
