In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. Alison Paul, et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. Alison Paul, et al

In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. Alison Paul, et al

Defendant / Appellee:	EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC., KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., TATUNG COMPANY, SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC., CMO JAPAN CO., LTD., CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC., NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA INC., MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LIMITED, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD., MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.), INC., PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SHARP CORPORATION, NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION, LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., CHI MEI CORPORATION, NEC CORPORATION, HITACHI LTD., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Not Classified By Court:	In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Appellant:	JOHNNY KESSEL and ALISON PAUL
Plaintiff / Appellee:	INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Case Number:	12-16830
Filed:	August 20, 2012
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Antitrust

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
May 23, 2014	Filing 65 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MAC): Appellants motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [9107374] (AF) [Entered: 05/23/2014 01:53 PM]
May 22, 2014	Filing 64 Filed (ECF) Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 05/22/2014. [9105834] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 05/22/2014 11:58 AM]
April 11, 2014	Filing 63 Terminated Kimberly Linnell Taylor for Epson Imaging Devices Corporation in 12-16830 (Csl no longer wtih firm) [9054605] (ASW) [Entered: 04/11/2014 10:47 AM]
March 26, 2014	Filing 62 Terminated Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation in 12-16830 [9032312] (BJB) [Entered: 03/26/2014 01:39 PM]
March 26, 2014	Filing 61 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LKK): Koninklijke Philips Electronic N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporations motion to amend the caption to reflect that they are not parties to this appeals is granted. The court records shall be amended. [9032306] (BJB) [Entered: 03/26/2014 01:38 PM]
January 30, 2014	Filing 60 Filed (ECF) Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Amend the Caption]. Date of service: 01/30/2014. [8959453] (Cullen, Brendan) [Entered: 01/30/2014 12:53 PM]
January 30, 2014	Filing 59 Attorneys Matthew Scott Fitzwater and Matthew Scott Fitzwater in 12-16830 substituted by Attorneys Brendan Peter Cullen and Brendan Peter Cullen in 12-16830 [8959018] (CW) [Entered: 01/30/2014 10:21 AM]
January 30, 2014	Filing 58 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Brendan P. Cullen for Appellees Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV and Philips Electronics North America Corporation. Date of service: 01/30/2014. [8958959] (Cullen, Brendan) [Entered: 01/30/2014 10:07 AM]
September 13, 2013	Filing 57 Terminated participation of Court Reporter James Jonathan Yeomans in this case. [8782334] (ASW) [Entered: 09/13/2013 04:13 PM]
August 27, 2013	Filing 56 Terminated Sean David Unger for Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16830, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16839, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15920, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15929, Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15930 and Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 13-15934 [8758404] [12-16839, 12-16830, 13-15920, 13-15929, 13-15930, 13-15934] (CW) [Entered: 08/27/2013 02:21 PM]
August 26, 2013	Filing 55 Received Attorney Sean David Unger, Esquire for Appellee Epson Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16839, 12-16830, 13-15920, 13-15929, 13-15930, 13-15934 letter dated 08/22/2013 re: request to be removed from service. Terminated counsel. Served on 08/22/2013 [8758392] [12-16839, 12-16830, 13-15920, 13-15929, 13-15930, 13-15934] (CW) [Entered: 08/27/2013 02:18 PM]
June 12, 2013	Filing 54 Terminated Chet Alan Kronenberg for LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. in 12-16830 [8664252] (CW) [Entered: 06/12/2013 09:18 AM]
June 11, 2013	Filing 53 Filed (ECF) Appellees LG Display America, Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd. Correspondence: Correspondence to Clerk re: Notice of Settlement in Underlying Case. Date of service: 06/11/2013 [8663914] (Kronenberg, Chet) [Entered: 06/11/2013 04:46 PM]
May 6, 2013	Filing 52 Terminated Daniel Suleiman for Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. in 12-16830 [8617689] (AF) [Entered: 05/06/2013 02:37 PM]
May 6, 2013	Filing 51 Mail returned on 05/06/2013 addressed to Daniel Suleiman for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc., re: Notice sent 4/10/2013. Resending to: Attorney is no longer working for the firm. (CASEFILES) [8617676] (AF) [Entered: 05/06/2013 02:35 PM]
April 17, 2013	Filing 50 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. Date of service: 01/28/2013. [8593583] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 04/17/2013 03:10 PM]
April 12, 2013	Filing 49 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The motion for summary affirmance of the district courts judgment is denied because the arguments raised in the opening brief are sufficiently substantial to warrant further consideration by a merits panel. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Appellees motion to designate this appeal as frivolous and motion for an award of damages are referred to the panel assigned to decide the merits of this appeal for whatever consideration the panel deems appropriate. Briefing is complete. (MOATT) [8588871] (BJB) [Entered: 04/12/2013 04:03 PM]
April 10, 2013	Filing 48 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 03/05/2013. [8584518]--[COURT UPDATE: Edited docket text to reflect correct excerpt type. Resent NDA. 04/10/2013 by RY] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 04/10/2013 11:15 AM]
April 10, 2013	Filing 47 Sent Notice requesting electronic excerpts in 14 days. [8584353] (SYS) [Entered: 04/10/2013 10:29 AM]
March 22, 2013	Filing 46 Received 7 paper copies of Reply brief [ # 42 ] filed by Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. [8562325] (SD) [Entered: 03/25/2013 09:08 AM]
March 22, 2013	Filing 45 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class reply to response (, ,motion for summary affirmance,motion for sanctions). Date of service: 03/22/2013. [8561929] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 03/22/2013 04:16 PM]
March 20, 2013	Filing 43 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 42 ] submitted by Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. The Court has reviewed the further excerpts of record [ # 40 ] submitted by Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 4 copies of the excerpts in paper format, with a white cover. The paper copies must be in the format described in 9th Circuit Rule 30-1.6. [8557517] (JB) [Entered: 03/20/2013 09:29 AM]
March 19, 2013	Filing 42 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. Date of service: 03/19/2013. [8557325] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 03/19/2013 10:05 PM]
March 18, 2013	Filing 44 Filed Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 40 ] in 1 volume (entitled Vol. 5). [8557526] (JB) [Entered: 03/20/2013 09:32 AM]
March 15, 2013	Filing 41 Filed (ECF) Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul response opposing motion (,motion for summary affirmance,motion for sanctions). Date of service: 03/15/2013. [8553525] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 03/15/2013 11:53 PM]
March 15, 2013	Filing 40 Submitted (ECF) further excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. Date of service: 03/15/2013. [8553522] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 03/15/2013 11:12 PM]
March 6, 2013	Filing 39 Received 7 paper copies of Answering brief [ # 35 ] filed by Indirect Plaintiff Class. [8540499] (SD) [Entered: 03/07/2013 08:57 AM]
March 6, 2013	Filing 37 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 35 ] submitted by Indirect Plaintiff Class is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8538872] (JB) [Entered: 03/06/2013 10:31 AM]
March 5, 2013	Filing 38 Filed Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class supplemental excerpts of record in 1 volume. [8539094] (JB) [Entered: 03/06/2013 11:26 AM]
March 5, 2013	Filing 36 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class Motion for summary affirmance, Motion for sanctions. Date of service: 03/05/2013. [8537617] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 03/05/2013 02:07 PM]
March 5, 2013	Filing 35 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 03/05/2013. [8537587] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 03/05/2013 02:01 PM]
February 19, 2013	Filing 34 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LKK): Granting Motion (ECF Filing) filed by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class; Granting Motion (ECF Filing) motion to extend time to file brief filed by Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class Appellees AU Optronics Corporation America, Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Renesas Electronics America, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chimei Innolux Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Indirect Plaintiff Class, Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV, LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Limited, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., LTD. and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. answering brief due 03/05/2013. The optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8517652] (LKK) [Entered: 02/19/2013 10:25 AM]
February 15, 2013	Filing 33 Filed Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul excerpts of record in 4 volume(s). [8516477] (LA) [Entered: 02/15/2013 02:31 PM]
February 15, 2013	Filing 32 Received corrected deficiency of additional copy of Vol. 4 of excerpts of record from Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. [8516474] (LA) [Entered: 02/15/2013 02:30 PM]
February 15, 2013	Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 03/06/2013. Date of service: 02/15/2013. [8516187] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 02/15/2013 01:06 PM]
February 14, 2013	Filing 30 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 31 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class Correspondence: Letter requesting unopposed extension of time to file answering brief due to late service of appellant's excerpt of record. Date of service: 02/14/2013 [8515342] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 02/14/2013 05:23 PM]
February 7, 2013	Filing 29 Received Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul excerpts of record in 4 volumes. Served on 01/28/2013. Deficiencies: insufficient copies of excerpts Vol. 4. Notified counsel (See attached notice). [8509407] (JB) [Entered: 02/11/2013 03:43 PM]
February 7, 2013	Filing 28 Received 7 paper copies of Opening brief [ # 26 ] filed by Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. [8504776] (SD) [Entered: 02/07/2013 02:33 PM]
January 22, 2013	Filing 27 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 26 ] submitted by Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 7 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification, attached to the end of each copy of the brief, that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The paper copies shall be printed from the PDF version of the brief created from the word processing application, not from PACER or Appellate ECF. [8481945] (JB) [Entered: 01/22/2013 11:42 AM]
January 18, 2013	Filing 26 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul. Date of service: 01/18/2013. [8480916] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 01/18/2013 10:50 PM]
January 9, 2013	Filing 25 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants opposed motion for a second extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due January 18, 2013. The answering brief is due February 19, 2013. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. No further motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief will be granted absent a detailed showing why an extension is necessary. A conclusory statement concerning the press of business will not suffice. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2. Appellees motion to dismiss is denied. (Pro Mo) [8466996] (MS) [Entered: 01/09/2013 10:13 AM]
December 31, 2012	Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul reply to response (). Date of service: 12/31/2012. [8457249] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 12/31/2012 09:26 PM]
December 20, 2012	Filing 23 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class response opposing motion (,motion to extend time to file brief). Date of service: 12/20/2012. [8448889] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 12/20/2012 04:07 PM]
December 19, 2012	Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 01/18/2013. Date of service: 12/19/2012. [8447222] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 12/19/2012 11:07 PM]
December 10, 2012	Filing 21 Added attorney John Bogdanov for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16830. [8432434] (CW) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:59 PM]
December 10, 2012	Filing 20 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John D. Bogdanov for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432376] (Bogdanov, John) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:47 PM]
December 10, 2012	Filing 19 Added attorney Tracy Rena Kirkham for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16830. [8432220] (CW) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:17 PM]
December 10, 2012	Filing 18 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tracy R. Kirkham for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432202] (Kirkham, Tracy) [Entered: 12/10/2012 02:12 PM]
December 10, 2012	Filing 17 Added attorney Josef Cooper for Indirect Plaintiff Class, in case 12-16830. [8432080] (CW) [Entered: 12/10/2012 01:37 PM]
December 10, 2012	Filing 16 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Josef D. Cooper for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 12/10/2012. [8432029] (Cooper, Josef) [Entered: 12/10/2012 01:23 PM]
December 3, 2012	Filing 15 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LKK): Appellants opposed motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due December 19, 2012. The answering brief is due January 18, 2013. The optional reply brief is due within 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8422620] (BJB) [Entered: 12/03/2012 10:21 AM]
November 26, 2012	Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class response opposing motion (,motion to extend time to file brief). Date of service: 11/26/2012. [8414586] (Scarpulla, Francis) [Entered: 11/26/2012 03:51 PM]
November 26, 2012	Filing 13 Added attorney Patrick B. Clayton for Indirect Plaintiff Class. [8414582] (RL) [Entered: 11/26/2012 03:50 PM]
November 26, 2012	Filing 12 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick B. Clayton for Appellee Indirect Plaintiff Class. Date of service: 11/26/2012. [8414559] (Clayton, Patrick) [Entered: 11/26/2012 03:46 PM]
November 20, 2012	Filing 11 Terminated Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America. [8409396] (HH) [Entered: 11/20/2012 12:08 PM]
November 16, 2012	Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 12/19/2012. Date of service: 11/16/2012. [8405134] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 11/16/2012 11:53 AM]
November 7, 2012	Filing 9 Filed order MEDIATION (BS):Due to a court docketing error, the caption of the order filed November 2, 2012, scheduling a dial-in settlement assessment conference call to discuss possible resolution of the appeals arising from the settlement of the Apple IPhone 4 Products Liability Litigation, incorrectly included appeals related to the TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation. The dial-in settlement assessment conference call, currently scheduled for Tuesday, November 13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time), will address only the appeals related to the Apple IPhone 4 Products Liability Litigation, Docket Nos. 12-16994, 12-17004 and 12-17005. No settlement assessment conference has been scheduled at this time to address the TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation. Circuit Mediator Peter W. Sherwood (Peter_Sherwood@ca9.uscourts.gov) will conduct the conference call on November 13, 2012. On or before November 9, 2012, all counsel to appeal nos. 12-16994, 12-17004 and 12-17005 who intend to participate in the conference shall provide their names and contact information to the Mediation Assistant at Elisa_Monterola@ca9.uscourts.gov. The dial-in information previously provided remains unchanged. [8391307] [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 12-16830, 12-16839, 12-16994, 12-17004, 12-17005] (KKW) [Entered: 11/07/2012 09:58 AM]
November 2, 2012	Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (BS): The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone settlement assessment conference, with counsel only, on November 13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time) to discuss whether this case is appropriate for participation in the Mediation Program. Dial-in information is available to counsel of record as a separate document attached to the electronic filing notification of this order. If any counsel of record is not able to access the dial-in information, please notify the Mediation Assistant immediately at Beatriz_Smith@ca9.uscourts.gov. On or before November 8, 2012, the parties shall provide the name and contact information of all counsel intending to participate in the conference to Beatriz_Smith@ca9.uscourts.gov. [12-16780, 12-16782, 12-16788, 12-16830, 12-16839, 12-16994, 12-17004, 12-17005] [8385659] (KKW) [Entered: 11/02/2012 09:27 AM]
October 1, 2012	Filing 7 Received copy of District Court order filed on 10/01/2012 denying defs mtn to certify under 28 USC 1292(b). [8347034] (CW) [Entered: 10/03/2012 02:48 PM]
September 28, 2012	Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 09/28/2012. [8341526] (Sutro, Stephen) [Entered: 09/28/2012 02:15 PM]
September 27, 2012	Filing 5 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Refiled using correct ECF event (motion). Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellees NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd. and Renesas Electronics America Correspondence: Request to be Removed from Docket. Date of service: 09/27/2012 [8340036] (Sutro, Stephen) [Entered: 09/27/2012 03:02 PM]
September 5, 2012	Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/05/2012. [8310604] (Palmer, Joseph) [Entered: 09/05/2012 11:20 AM]
August 30, 2012	Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION (EPM): The Court of Appeals records do not indicate that appellants have filed a Mediation Questionnaire in accordance with Circuit Rule 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing of this order, appellants shall: (a) file a Mediation Questionnaire (available on the court's website, www.ca9.uscourts.gov); (b) dismiss the appeal voluntarily pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); or (c) show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [8305431] (BJB) [Entered: 08/30/2012 11:09 AM]
August 28, 2012	Filing 2 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 455.00. Date paid: 08/28/2012. [8302837] (RT) [Entered: 08/28/2012 03:25 PM]
August 20, 2012	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Fee due from Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul on 08/06/2012. Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/27/2012. Transcript ordered by 09/10/2012. Transcript due 10/09/2012. Appellants Johnny Kessel and Alison Paul opening brief due 11/19/2012. Appellees AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., Chimei Innolux Corp., Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi Ltd., Indirect Plaintiff Class, Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., LG Display America, Inc., LG Display Co., Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Limited, Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech USA Inc., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Renesas Electronics America, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology Co., LTD. and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. answering brief due 12/18/2012. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 14 days after service of the answering brief. [8292977] (RT) [Entered: 08/20/2012 04:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. Alison Paul, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Stephen P. Freccero
Represented By:	Stephen E. Taylor Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC.
Represented By:	James McGinnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	William Farmer Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION
Represented By:	Christopher M. Curran
Represented By:	John H. Chung
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Melvin R. Goldman Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Jeffrey Michael Davidson Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TATUNG COMPANY
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	William Farmer Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	James McGinnis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Kent Michael Roger
Represented By:	Courtney Lynn Landis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CMO JAPAN CO., LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Harrison Frahn
Represented By:	James U. Kreissman Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Harrison Frahn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Anne Kaldor Sauro
Represented By:	Jacob R. Sorensen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher M. Curran
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	John H. Chung
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Harrison Frahn
Represented By:	James U. Kreissman Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MITSUI & CO. (TAIWAN), LIMITED
Represented By:	Peter W. James Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher M. Curran
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	John H. Chung
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Kent Michael Roger
Represented By:	Courtney Lynn Landis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Sam Dawood Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Holly Adele House Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC LCD TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	William Farmer Esquire
Represented By:	Joel Steven Sanders
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MITSUI & CO. (U.S.A.), INC.
Represented By:	Ernest Eugene Vargo Esquire Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHARP CORPORATION
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Anne Kaldor Sauro
Represented By:	Jacob R. Sorensen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA MATSUSHITA DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Represented By:	John H. Chung
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Harrison Frahn
Represented By:	James U. Kreissman Esquire
Represented By:	Jake J. Ewart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Neil Kenneth Roman Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Represented By:	Jerry Chen Esquire
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Donald H. Mullins Esquire
Represented By:	Ismail Ramsey
Represented By:	Robert E. Freitas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Hojoon Hwang Esquire
Represented By:	Hailyn Jennifer Chen
Represented By:	Holly Adele House Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHI MEI CORPORATION
Represented By:	Harrison Frahn
Represented By:	James U. Kreissman Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NEC CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HITACHI LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Kent Michael Roger
Represented By:	Courtney Lynn Landis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC.
Represented By:	Jason H. Wilson
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	Martha Ann Boersch Esquire
Represented By:	Allison M. Dibley Esquire
Represented By:	Kirk Christopher Jenkins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Represented By:	Christopher M. Curran
Represented By:	Christopher A. Nedeau Esquire
Represented By:	John H. Chung
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Not classified by court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellant: JOHNNY KESSEL
Represented By:	Joseph Darrell Palmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Appellant: ALISON PAUL
Represented By:	Joseph Darrell Palmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Represented By:	Qianwei Fu
Represented By:	Judith Zahid
Represented By:	Francis O. Scarpulla Esquire
Represented By:	Patrick B. Clayton
Represented By:	John Bogdanov
Represented By:	Craig C. Corbitt Esquire
Represented By:	Joseph M. Alioto
Represented By:	Josef Cooper
Represented By:	Theresa D. Moore Esquire
Represented By:	Heather Thompson Rankie
Represented By:	Tracy Rena Kirkham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?