Kenneth Thunderbird v. State of Oregon, et al
| KENNETH THUNDERBIRD |
| STATE OF OREGON, Employees, Agents, Agencies, SNAKE RIVER MEDICAL FACILITY, STEVE SHELTON, Medical Director for ODOC, MAX WILLIAMS, Director of Department of Corrections, State of Oregon, MARK NOOTH, Superintendent of Snake River Corrections, GULICK, Medical Provider, SRCI, SNAKE RIVER SECURITY DEPARTMENT, all staff members, all security officers acting under the colors of the State of Oregon and the Snake River Correctional Instituition, BASSETT, CAIN, Security Officer, WAYNE HOLLOPETER, MCNIT, Security Officer, SRCI, HENSLEY, Security Officer, SRCI, STRINGER, ADAMS, Security Officer, SRCI, SHEPPARD, Security Officer, PATRICK, Security Officer, OSCI, HODGE, Nurse, GRIFFIN, Nurse, CLARK, Nurse, KELLER, Nurse, MERRIT, Staff Member, HUNT, Staff Member, KUDRAM, GROSS, Staff Member, DEAN, Staff Member, BULISON, Staff Member, WILSON, Staff Member, JOHNSTON, HICKS, Ms., TRCI MEDICAL FACILITY, HAYS, Nurse TRCI, HANSEN, OREGON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, "Public Entity", DON MILLS, Superintendent of Two Rivers Corrections (Hereafter TRCI) " Public Entity, TWO RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUITION, (Hereafter TRCI), SNAKE RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, (Hereafter SRCI), G. LYLTES, Medical Provider, TRCI, HEALTH SERVICES OF SRCI AND TRCI, "Public Entity", SIMMONS, Nurse TRCI, WHILAN, Nurse, TRCI, WANUS, Security Officer, SRCI and POWELL, Security Officer, TRCI |
| 12-35588 |
| July 13, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KENNETH THUNDERBIRD V. STATE OF OREGON |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
