Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Stringer v. Jordan et al
as 1:2026cv03806
Plaintiff:
Michael Stringer
Defendant:
Donald Jordan and JD and Billy Hines Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Arnold et al v. Powles et al
as 1:2026cv05812
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Arnold
Defendant:
Pillion Powles, Sheriff Areta, Colonel Catletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
South Carolina Republican Party v. Bolchoz et al
as 3:2026cv02699
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Republican Party
Defendant:
Robert Bolchoz, Joanne Day, Clifford J. Edler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Arnold v. Powles et al
as 1:2026cv05724
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Arnold
Defendant:
Sgt. Dillion Powles, Sheriff Paul Arteta, Colonel Catletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Champelle v. Sparks et al
as 1:2026cv00632
Plaintiff:
Devontay Trayvon Champelle
Defendant:
Co Sparks and Lt. Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Mcneil Stringer
as 2:2026rd00038
Unknown:
Charles Mcneil Stringer
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Stringer v. Diperri
as 1:2026cv12247
Plaintiff:
Maurice Stringer
Defendant:
Adam Diperri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Stringer v. King et al
as 2:2026cv00541
Plaintiff:
Vickie M. Stringer
Defendant:
Michelle King and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Sharp, M.D. v. Virginia Commonwealth University et al
as 3:2026cv00302
Defendant:
VCU Health System Authority, VCU School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen P Sharp, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
