Cases 1 - 10 of 33
IH3 Property Georgia LP v. Stringer
as 1:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
IH3 Property Georgia LP
Defendant:
Thaddeus Stringer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moon v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Juliette Moon
Defendant:
Wayne T. Williams, Robert S. Kelly, Rob Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Brown v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brown
Defendant:
Carltez D. Jefferson, Mike Ireland, Jessica Matthews and others
Stringer v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
D'Ebony Stringer
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson et al v. Stringer et al
as 1:2020cv05208
Defendant:
Daseke Management Corporation, Joe Paul Stringer, Hudson Insurance Group and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taylor and Aredila Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
STRINGER v. HEAD et al
as 5:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
MYDRIA STRINGER, JR
Defendant:
WARDEN FREDRICK J HEAD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JANE DOE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stringer v. Head et al
as 6:2019cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mydria Stringer, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden Fredrick J. Head and Sally Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $12,529.29 et al
as 1:2019cv02084
Defendant:
One Rolex Watch, $12,529.29, 64 Monet Court, NW, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia 30327 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Jessica Stringer
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
