Mitchell Taebel v. Maricopa County Attorney's Of, et al
| DOUG DUCEY, Governor, AARON HARDER, Deputy County Attorney, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, COUNTY OF MARICOPA and WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY |
| MITCHELL TAEBEL |
| 19-15023 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 COURT DELETED INCORRECT/DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 5 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellees Aaron Harder and William G. Montgomery Correspondence: County Attorney Appellees Response to Appellants Statement that Appeal should go forward. Date of service: 03/01/2019 [11213372] [19-15023] (Stutz, Christine) [Entered: 03/01/2019 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Aaron Harder and William G. Montgomery response to motion ([ # 3 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 03/01/2019. [11213337] [19-15023] (Stutz, Christine) [Entered: 03/01/2019 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Mitchell Taebel statement that appeal should go forward; no proof of service. [11201599] (RR) [Entered: 02/20/2019 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Mitchell Taebel motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: No proof of service. [11190555] (RR) [Entered: 02/14/2019 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11145121] (CKP) [Entered: 01/08/2019 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Mitchell Taebel opening brief due 03/04/2019. Appellees County of Maricopa, Doug Ducey, Aaron Harder, Maricopa County Attorney's Office and William G. Montgomery answering brief due 04/04/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11142481] (RT) [Entered: 01/04/2019 04:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
