Vernon McNeal v. A. Ervin, et al
C. CHATHAM, A. ERVIN, F. LECKIE and D. VAN LEER |
VERNON WAYNE MCNEAL |
19-15465 |
March 14, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Attorney Andrea R. Sloan substituted by Attorney Kevin Allen Voth. [11291933] (RL) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:49 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kevin A. Voth for Appellees A. Ervin, F. Leckie, D. Van Leer and C. Chatham. Substitution for Attorney Andrea R. Sloan for Appellees C. Chatham, A. Ervin, F. Leckie and D. Van Leer. Date of service: 05/09/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11291897] [19-15465] (Voth, Kevin) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:38 AM] |
Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11259284] (CKP) [Entered: 04/10/2019 11:51 AM] |
Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 03/28/2019. [Case Number 19-15465: Partially Paid] [11258468] (RL) [Entered: 04/09/2019 04:18 PM] |
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11240667] (CKP) [Entered: 03/25/2019 11:11 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 04/05/2019. Transcript due 05/06/2019. Appellant Vernon Wayne McNeal opening brief due 06/14/2019. Appellees C. Chatham, A. Ervin, F. Leckie and D. Van Leer answering brief due 07/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11228512] (RT) [Entered: 03/14/2019 04:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.