Mark Picozzi v. Clark County Detention Center, et al
| CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, DOUG GILLESPIE, Sheriff, FLOYD, Sgt., NAPHCARE MEDICAL, CCDC, LEE, Officer, LOUMICHAS, Officer CCDC, AMANDA VERTNER, Nurse, BUSINESS OFFICE CCDC, TODD FASULO, Deputy Chief CCDC, CLASSIFICATION/INTEL, 7TH FLOOR SGTS., BENNETT, Officer CCDC, OLACO, Officer CCDC, R. MOESHER, Officer CCDC, GAINES, Officer CCDC, ROGERS, Sgt., 5TH FLOOR SGTS CCDC, STEVE SISOLAK, Commissioner, COOPER, Officer, RICHARD SUEY, Lt.; Captain CCDC, LEPORE, Lieutenant CCDC and MAILROOM CCDC |
| JOLLEY, Officer CCDC, COKER, Officer CCDC, GOINS, Officer CCDC, CARR, Officer CCDC, JUDD, Sgt., T. PHILLIPS, Officer CCDC, GARCIA, HANS, Officer CCDC, G. RAZZO, Officer CCDC, HIGHTOWER, Officer CCDC, DAOS, Officer CCDC and M. BROOKS, Officer CCDC |
| MARK PICOZZI |
| 19-16665 |
| August 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Mark Picozzi declaration under penalty of perjury. Dated 10/07/2019. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11465127] (RL) [Entered: 10/15/2019 08:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): The court has received appellants letter dated September 23, 2019 [ # 4 ] requesting confirmation of the orders issued in this appeal. The Clerk shall send appellant a copy of the public docket sheet for this appeal. Appellants time to file a declaration in response to the September 16, 2019 order to show cause is extended to October 12, 2019. Appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants declaration. The briefing schedule remains suspended pending further order of the court. . [11448476] (CKP) [Entered: 09/30/2019 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Mark Picozzi letter dated 09/23/2019 re: Questions regarding what court clerk has sent to appellant. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11447074] (RL) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district court judgment was entered on the docket on September 26, 2018. Appellants notice of appeal from that judgment is dated October 2, 2018, but was not received by the district court until August 22, 2019. Thus, the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the entry of the judgment. See 28 U.S.C 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Appellants August 16, 2019 letter attached to the notice of appeal states that appellant initially filed the notice of appeal on October 2, 2018, but that appellant did not receive confirmation of its filing from the district court. The district court docket does not reflect a notice of appeal received prior to August 22, 2019. Because appellant is a pro se prisoner, however, the notice of appeal is deemed filed when it was delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall file with this court a declaration or notarized statement attesting to the date on which the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions internal mail system and whether first-class postage was prepaid, or otherwise show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103 (9th Cir. 2009). Along with his declaration, appellant shall provide a prison mail log reflecting entries for October 2018. A response may be filed within 10 days after service of appellants declaration. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [11432573] (CKP) [Entered: 09/16/2019 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-16665: IFP] ). [11416883] (JW) [Entered: 08/30/2019 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Mark Picozzi opening brief due 10/21/2019. Appellees M. Brooks, Carr, Coker, Daos, Garcia, Goins, Hans, Hightower, Jolley, Judd, T. Phillips and G. Razzo answering brief due 11/20/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11410521] (JMR) [Entered: 08/26/2019 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.