Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04665
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03273
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03188
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv27845
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13663
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03665
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Arellano-Garcia v. Morris et al
as 5:2026hc02173
Respondent:
William K. Marshall, III and Roger D. Morris
Petitioner:
Jorge Luis Arellano-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 1:2026cv00216
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Garcia v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC
as 7:2026cv00531
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
Plaintiff:
Naomi Arisa Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 3:2026cv00934
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
