Joseph McCoy v. Angel Gonzales, et al
| KEN CLARK, Warden, A. ENENMOH and J. CLARK KELSO |
| JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY |
| ANGEL GONZALES, C. BELTRAN, R. FISHER, C. STRONACH, N. TANN, K. LEMAY and D. SNELL |
| 19-17352 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Joseph Raymond McCoy motion for clarification of issues, request to modify, reverse or vacate. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/26/2019. [11549722] (CW) [Entered: 01/03/2020 07:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARSHA S. BERZON and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Medhekar v. United States Dist. Court, 99 F.3d 325, 326 (9th Cir. 1996) (discovery orders not immediately appealable); see also United States v. Washington, 573 F.2d 1121, 1122 (9th Cir. 1978) (order denying motion to disqualify judge is not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11535539] (OC) [Entered: 12/17/2019 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joseph Raymond McCoy opening brief due 01/17/2020. Appellees C. Beltran, R. Fisher, Angel Gonzales, K. Lemay, D. Snell, C. Stronach and N. Tann answering brief due 02/18/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11505936] (JPD) [Entered: 11/20/2019 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
