Cases 1 - 10 of 303
(PC) Fisher v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
J Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Joseph Roberts, et al v. Borough of Manheim, et al
as 24-1830
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ROBERTS, KIM ZAPATA, doing business as KIM'S CARS and KIM ZAPATA
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MANHEIM, DONNA CZEINER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIALCAPACITY AS ZONING AND CODESOFFICER, ADRIN VARGAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIALCAPACITY AS ASSISTANT ZONING ANDCODES OFFICER and others
Major v. McVege et al
as 4:2024cv02629
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Major
Defendant:
McVege, Bravo, Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrel Fisher v. United States, et al
as 24-1870
Plaintiff:
Darrel R. Fisher
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Biden
Darrel R Fisher v. Gerald McKinney et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Gerald McKinney and Larry DiCieno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
United States of America and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fisher v. O'Brien
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Darrel R Fisher
Defendant:
Mark E O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewideh et al v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest et al
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Omar Ewideh and Nivertiti Geaith
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company of The Midwest, American Family Insurance, AFICS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Fisher v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
as 5:2024ct03026
Plaintiff:
Darrel R. Fisher
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
