Luis Vargas v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| LUIS LORENZO VARGAS |
| SCOTT SMITH, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DOES, 1-10, inclusive, RICHARD TAMEZ, MONICA QUIJANO and LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 19-55967 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| LUIS VARGAS V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11437745] (MS) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 11 Added Attorney(s) Steven Art for party(s) Appellant Luis Lorenzo Vargas, in case 19-55967. [11417999] (QDL) [Entered: 09/03/2019 08:37 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Steven Edward Art (Loevy & Loevy, 311 N. Aberdeen St., 3rd Fl., Chicago, IL 60607) for Appellant Luis Lorenzo Vargas. Date of service: 09/03/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11417973] [19-55967] (Art, Steven) [Entered: 09/03/2019 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 09/13/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11416739] (BLS) [Entered: 08/30/2019 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 8 Attorney Geoffrey Plowden in 19-55967 substituted by Attorney Matthew Alex Scherb in 19-55967 [11412938] (QDL) [Entered: 08/28/2019 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew A. Scherb (Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, 200 N. Main Street, 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellees City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department and Monica Quijano. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Geoffrey Plowden for Appellees City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Police Department, Monica Quijano, Scott Smith and Richard Tamez. Date of service: 08/28/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11412895] [19-55967] (Scherb, Matthew) [Entered: 08/28/2019 08:16 AM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/27/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11412789][19-55967] (AD) [Entered: 08/27/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Luis Lorenzo Vargas Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/27/2019. [11412321] [19-55967] (Leff, Alison) [Entered: 08/27/2019 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Alison Leff for party(s) Appellant Luis Lorenzo Vargas, in case 19-55967. [11411442] (QDL) [Entered: 08/27/2019 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Alison R. Leff (Loevy & Loevy, 311 N. Aberdeen St., 3rd Fl., Chicago, IL 60607) for Appellant Luis Lorenzo Vargas. Date of service: 08/27/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11411392] [19-55967] (Leff, Alison) [Entered: 08/27/2019 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11406769] (TSP) [Entered: 08/22/2019 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/27/2019. Transcript ordered by 09/18/2019. Transcript due 10/18/2019. Appellant Luis Lorenzo Vargas opening brief due 11/27/2019. Appellees City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Los Angeles Police Department, Office of the Los Angeles District Attorney, Monica Quijano, Scott Smith and Richard Tamez answering brief due 12/27/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11403186] (JBS) [Entered: 08/20/2019 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
