Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2026cv05153
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Smith
Defendant:
Adam E Ramirez and Jacqulynn Faith Cassey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01163
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cox v. Schuyler County et al
as 6:2026cv06654
Plaintiff:
Samantha E. Cox
Defendant:
Schuyler County, Kevin Rumsey, E. Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Harper et al
as 1:2026cv01564
Plaintiff:
Scott Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Harper and Lieutenant Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis v. Smith et al
as 2:2026cv00936
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Respondent:
Scott Smith and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00828
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Suarez-Gonzalez v. Olson et al
as 2:2026cv00590
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Suarez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Sam Olson, Dale J Schmidt, Scott Smith and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
