David Allen v. Cliff Allenby, et al
PAM AHLIN, Executive Director of State Hospitals, FRESNO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AUDREY KING, Ex-Director of Coalinga State Hospital, JERRY BROWN and NORM KRAMER, Director of State Mental Hospitals |
CLIFF ALLENBY, Ex-Executive Director of all Five Hospitals and STEPHEN MAYBERG, Ex-Executive Director of all Five Hospitals |
DAVID ALLEN |
20-15549 |
March 30, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case filed by Appellant David Allen. Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). This order shall constitute the mandate. [11697631] (CKP) [Entered: 05/21/2020 09:39 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee Stephen Mayberg response non-opposing motion/form/notice at [ # 2 ] Party Motion. Date of service: 05/19/2020. I certify that I have separately notified all parties not registered for Appellate Electronic Filing in this case with notice of this non-opposition. [11695044] [20-15549] (Wheeler, Joseph) [Entered: 05/19/2020 09:30 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant David Allen motion to dismiss the case. Deficiencies: None. [11694164] (NAC) [Entered: 05/18/2020 02:38 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Allen opening brief due 05/26/2020. Appellees Cliff Allenby and Stephen Mayberg answering brief due 06/25/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11645743] (JMR) [Entered: 03/30/2020 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.