Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hughes v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv00142
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Hughes
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. David Allen Proctor D.O., Mr. Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Walters et al
as 7:2026cv00558
Plaintiff:
David Allen Dean
Defendant:
Joseph W. Walters, Richard Alsbrook, Ms. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
United States of America v. Elm
as 26-4305
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID ALLEN ELM
SUTTON v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv01416
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN SUTTON
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bellinsky v. Weiser, et al
as 26-1256
Plaintiff:
JACOB BELLINSKY
Defendant:
PHILIP J. WEISER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Colorado, LARRY DESBIEN, officially as Director of Colorado Division of Child Support Services, COUNTY OF ELBERT, corporately and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ABC IP, LLC et al v. Velocity Ammunition Sales, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00533
Plaintiff:
ABC IP, LLC, Rare Breed Triggers, Inc. and RBTM LLC
Defendant:
Velocity Ammunition Sales, LLC and David Allen Hazlett
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Azizi v. Rubi et al
as 1:2026cv01513
Plaintiff:
Abbas Azizi
Defendant:
Marco Rubi and David Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.