Karena Feng v. County of Santa Clara, et al
| AMBER ROSEN |
| COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, BRIAN HAWKINSON, ROCHELLE C. EAST, Judge, ARTHUR GEE-YEH TAN, MAYRA ALVAREZ, COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ANNA PATROWSKY, Ph.D. and AMY YIM |
| KARENA APPLE FENG |
| 20-15711 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ms. Karena Apple Feng Motion for appointment of pro bono counsel and Response to motion ([ # 6 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 05/13/2020. [11688969] [20-15711] (Feng, Karena) [Entered: 05/13/2020 01:43 AM] |
| Filing 8 Attorneys Claire Truxaw Cormier, Claire Truxaw Cormier and Claire Truxaw Cormier in 20-15711 substituted by Attorneys Karan Singh Dhadialla, Karan Singh Dhadialla and Karan Singh Dhadialla in 20-15711 [11677197] (CW) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Karan Singh Dhadialla (Office of the County Counsel, County of Santa Clara 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing, 9th Floor, San Jose, CA 95110) for Appellees Mayra Alvarez, County of Santa Clara and Brian Hawkinson. Substitution for Attorney Claire Truxaw Cormier, Esquire for Appellees Mayra Alvarez, County of Santa Clara and Brian Hawkinson. Date of service: 04/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11677173] [20-15711] (Dhadialla, Karan) [Entered: 04/30/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Karena Apple Feng motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/24/2020. [11675761] (CW) [Entered: 04/29/2020 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/28/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11675062]. [20-15711] (AD) [Entered: 04/28/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees County of San Francisco and Amy Yim Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/28/2020. [11674844] [20-15711] (Berdux, Sabrina) [Entered: 04/28/2020 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/27/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11673510]. [20-15711] (AD) [Entered: 04/27/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee Anna Patrowsky Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/27/2020. [11672943] [20-15711] --[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected mediation questionnaire. 4/27/2020 by TYL] (Lustig, Christopher) [Entered: 04/27/2020 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Karena Apple Feng opening brief due 06/17/2020. Appellees Mayra Alvarez, County of San Francisco, County of Santa Clara, Rochelle C. East, Brian Hawkinson, Anna Patrowsky, Arthur Gee-Yeh Tan and Amy Yim answering brief due 07/17/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11665566] (JMR) [Entered: 04/20/2020 10:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
