Andre Adams v. Arizona, State of, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANDRE ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Complex Warden, Eyman-Meadows Unit, DAVID SHINN, Director, Brnovich, ARIZONA, STATE OF and HOPE PING, Deputy Warden
Case Number: 20-16210
Filed: June 22, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2020 Filing 12 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and DANIEL A. BRESS): Upon a review of the record, the response to the order to show cause, and the opening brief received on July 2, 2020, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 4 ] and [ # 10 ]), see 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). All other pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11794108] (AF) [Entered: 08/18/2020 04:43 PM]
August 11, 2020 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Andre Adams letter dated 08/11/2020 re: request for clarification. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11784394] (CW) [Entered: 08/11/2020 09:12 AM]
August 5, 2020 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Andre Adams supp motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis request for status of pending emergency motion. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/04/2020. [11778423] (CW) [Entered: 08/05/2020 01:16 PM]
July 21, 2020 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Andre Adams response to 7/14/20. Served on 07/21/2020. [11760738] (CW) [Entered: 07/21/2020 02:18 PM]
July 14, 2020 Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MN): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on July 2, 2020, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11752187] (AF) [Entered: 07/14/2020 11:05 AM]
July 9, 2020 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Andre Adams EMERGENCY motion for injunction pending appeal and TRO. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/09/2020. [11747514] (CW) [Entered: 07/09/2020 01:20 PM]
July 2, 2020 Filing 6 Received Appellant Andre Adams opening brief of 9 pages (Informal: No). Served on 07/02/2020. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed (IFP motion is pending). [11742693] (LA) [Entered: 07/06/2020 12:41 PM]
June 29, 2020 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): Appellants was granted electronic filing status on June 24, 2020. Accordingly, appellants request for electronic filing [ # 3 ] is denied as moot. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which will be addressed by separate order. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11736684] (CKP) [Entered: 06/29/2020 02:25 PM]
June 26, 2020 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Andre Adams motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/25/2020. [11734577] (CW) [Entered: 06/26/2020 09:16 AM]
June 24, 2020 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Andre Adams request for electronic filing and IFP application. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/24/2020. [11732611] (QDL) [Entered: 06/24/2020 03:25 PM]
June 24, 2020 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11732299] (CKP) [Entered: 06/24/2020 01:14 PM]
June 22, 2020 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Andre Adams opening brief due 08/18/2020. [11729066] (WL) [Entered: 06/22/2020 11:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Andre Adams v. Arizona, State of, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ANDRE ADAMS
Represented By: Andre Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, Complex Warden, Eyman-Meadows Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Brnovich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARIZONA, STATE OF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HOPE PING, Deputy Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?