Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Miller v. Taylor
as 26-60324
Plaintiff:
Garrick Lashun Miller, also known as Rabbit
Defendant:
Brad Taylor, NBN Agent, In Both His Individual and Official Capacity, William Randel Yeatman, NBN Agent, In Both His Individual and Official Capacity, also known as Bo Yeatman, Andre Adams, MDOC Officer, In Both His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Adams v. Perimeter Security Partners
as 8:2026cv00159
Petitioner:
Andre Adams
Defendant:
Perimeter Security Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2026cv00030
Plaintiff:
Garrick L. Miller
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi, William Randle Yeatman, Brad Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GOKOOL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2025cv01809
Plaintiff:
RAMISH GOKOOL, LIAH GOKOOL, ANJELO GOKOOL and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Miller v. Taylor et al
as 1:2025cv00086
Defendant:
William Randel Yeatman, Andre Adams, Barry Gladney and others
Plaintiff:
Garrick Lashun Miller and Rabbit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Holler Law Firm et al
as 1:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
Sherry Adams
Defendant:
Holler Law Firm, Najarian Capital, LLC, Scott K. Camp and Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19236
Plaintiff:
ANDRE ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07599
Plaintiff:
ANDRE ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nicholson et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv08751
Plaintiff:
Bobby Cobb, Alvin Lemuel Monroe, Marian S. Carrillo and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
