Joseph McCoy v. J. Kelso, et al
| JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY |
| ANGEL GONZALES, A. ENENMOH, R. FISHER, KEN CLARK, Warden, C. STRONACH, J. CLARK KELSO, N. TANN, C. BELTRAN, K. LEMAY and D. SNELL |
| 20-17113 |
| October 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11929077] (AF) [Entered: 12/15/2020 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joseph Raymond McCoy opening brief due 12/28/2020. Appellees Angel Gonzales, et al. answering brief due 01/25/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11872684] (JPD) [Entered: 10/27/2020 09:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
