Michael Swanson v. United States Attorney General, et al
| RENATA GOWIE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MICHAEL RAY SWANSON |
| UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 20-35152 |
| February 21, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Michael Ray Swanson motion to combine case info. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 03/31/2020. [11651244] (RL) [Entered: 04/03/2020 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and ERIC D. MILLER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the February 19, 2020 notice of appeal was not filed within 60 days after either the district courts judgment entered on November 29, 2018, or the post-judgment order entered on December 10, 2018. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(b); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11644563] (OC) [Entered: 03/27/2020 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael Ray Swanson opening brief due 04/22/2020. Appellee United States Attorney General answering brief due 05/22/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11604617] (RT) [Entered: 02/21/2020 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
