Nathan Byerly v. National Commission on Correct, et al
| RONA SIEGERT, ADA COUNTY, JODI LEMON, JESSICA GAZZETI, JOSHUA TUCKETT, CODY MATTINGLY, NATIONAL COMMISSION ON CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, STATE OF IDAHO, APRIL DAWSON and CORIZON HEALTH, INC. |
| NATHAN B. BYERLY |
| 20-35352 |
| April 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Nathan B. Byerly motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11694257] (NAC) [Entered: 05/18/2020 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 Mail returned on 05/11/2020 addressed to Nathan B. Byerly, re: 04/24/2020 Case Opening Information [ # 1 ]. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, refused. Resending to: IMSI - IDAHO MAXIMUM SECURITY INSTITUTION P.O. Box 51 Boise, ID 83707. [11688272] --[Edited: Updated Address. 05/12/2020 by TYL] (JBS) [Entered: 05/12/2020 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Nathan B. Byerly motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/05/2020. [11685906] (CW) [Entered: 05/11/2020 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Nathan B. Byerly additional documents and statements in support of case. Dated 04/20/2020. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11678133] (RL) [Entered: 05/01/2020 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11672761] (CKP) [Entered: 04/27/2020 01:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nathan B. Byerly opening brief due 06/30/2020. [11670694] (RT) [Entered: 04/24/2020 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
