Joshua Snyder v. County of Riverside, et al
| J. DOE, #3, Captain, J. DOE, #2, Office Assistant, J. DOE, #4, Captain, J. DOE, #5, Head of Medical Staff, MOULTON, MARSHALL, #N2755, J. DOE, #1, Office Assistant, WIMBERRY, #N4964, HOOK, #N5765 and D. MONTENEGRO |
| LETICIA MEEK, Registered Nurse, Individual, BOB BUSTER, Board of Supervisor, individual and official capacity, JOSEPH MCNAMARA, Captain - Jail Commander, an individual, E. VALENZUELA, Warden, C Cpl, an individual, VAUGHN, Registered Nurse, JOHN TAVAGLIONE, Board of Supervisor, individual and official capacty, W. PUGH, Correctional Deputy, an individual, SYLVIA DE LA CRUZ, an individual, STEPHEN WIMBERRY, Employee, C.D., an individual, JERRY GUTIERREZ, Correctional Chief Deputy, an individual and official capacity, JASMINE OROZCO, an individual, MICHAEL MOULTON, Sergent, an individual, SEXTON, Sergeant #N3550, an individual, BRIAN HOOK, Employee of R.S.C., an individual, KENNETH PAULSON, Lieutenant, an individual, JOHN BENOIT, Board of Supervisor, Individual and official capacity, VIRGINIA BUSBY, Captain - Jail Commander, individual and official capacity, ROBERT RICHARDSON, RN, an individual, MARION ASHLEY, Board of Supervisor, in her official capacity, D. PACKER, THOMAS MARSHALL, Corporal, individual, STAN SNIFF, Sheriff, Individual, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Public Entity, Official Capacity, VICTOR LAUS, M.D., individual and offical capacity, GARY ROMBAL, RN, an individual, KEVIN JEFFRIES, Board Supervisor, Individual and official capacity, DOES, 39-50, DHS Health care professionals and/or employees, individual, DOES, 1-38, DIONISIO MONTENEGRO, an individual, GARY . THOMPSON, Medical Doctor, an individual, DODJIE HILARO, Nurse Practioner, Individual, VELORIA LOURDES, RN, BSN, an individual, BILL DI YORIO, Under Sheriff, Individual, REEVES RHONDA, Register Nurse, Individual, CINDY LEWIS, R. MARQUEZ, C.D. II, an individual and T. JACKSON, an individual |
| JOSHUA FRANKLIN SNYDER |
| 20-55347 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (MHM, JBO and MJB) [11695014] (JFF) [Entered: 05/19/2020 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (MARY H. MURGUIA, JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) A review of the record demonstrates that all parties did not consent to proceed before the magistrate judge. See Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017) (all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent in order for jurisdiction to vest with the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1)); Columbia Record Productions v. Hot Wax Records, Inc., 966 F.2d 515, 516-17 (9th Cir. 1992) (holding that absent consent, a federal magistrate judge lacked authority to render a post-judgment decision that has a dispositive effect on the parties). Consequently, we vacate the magistrate judges March 26, 2020 order and remand for further proceedings. On remand, the district judge may treat the magistrate judges order as a report and recommendation. VACATED and REMANDED. [11672595] (OC) [Entered: 04/27/2020 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellees County of Riverside, Bill Di Yorio and Stan Sniff Correspondence: Response to docketing letter and notice to parties re (1) there is no judgment in the district court and (2) the list of parties is not correct. Date of service: 04/02/2020 [11650130] [20-55347] (Lockwood, Christopher) [Entered: 04/02/2020 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Joshua Franklin Snyder opening brief due 06/01/2020. Appellees County of Riverside, et al., answering brief due 06/30/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11649867] (JPD) [Entered: 04/02/2020 11:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
