Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Roberts #280668 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2026cv06401
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Stephanie Moulton, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook et al v. Leighton Security Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2026cv00680
Plaintiff:
Doug Cook, Arthur Finney, Leonardo Moulton and others
Defendant:
Leighton Security Services, Inc. and Precision Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 6:2026cv03509
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv01327
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 3:2026cv01068
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv13428
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 2:2026cv00163
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. BELLUCK et al
as 1:2026cv00743
Plaintiff:
NANCY POWERS
Defendant:
JOSEPH W. BELLUCK, TAA GRAYS, FERNANDO M. CAMACHO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers v. Belluck et al
as 1:2026cv02177
Plaintiff:
Nancy Powers
Defendant:
Joseph W. Belluck, Taa Grays, Fernando M. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
